hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardy...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Community Policies to prevent conflicts
Date Tue, 19 Mar 2013 02:27:52 GMT
>> - Voting for an appropriate time window that a committer can assume silence
>> as a +1 on his patch.

If it's a trivial issue and every unit tests can be passed, I think we
don't need to wait until reviewed.

And, we should not change the unit test logic to avoid build failure.
I think it is one of the causes of creating additional bugs.

On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Tommaso Teofili
<tommaso.teofili@gmail.com> wrote:
> I generally agree with Ed's proposal.
>
>
> 2013/3/15 Suraj Menon <surajsmenon@apache.org>
>
>> +1 Thank you for the information Edward and we start afresh. I think things
>> should be lot simpler within a small team like ours. I am touching on
>> topics related to code and commit protocol here.
>>
>> We are trying to get a resolution on three points and the voting could be
>> done in appropriate channel. Let me know if this is the correct place to do
>> the votings.
>> - Voting for/against "Review then commit" policy
>>
>
> sure, we can vote for that (I think a reasonable compromise could be what
> Doug Cutting comments here
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8248?focusedCommentId=13247658&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13247658)
> however we can probably create a [DISCUSS] thread before and
> eventually
> vote afterwards so that we can collect different opinions before voting.
>
>
>> - Voting for an appropriate time window that a committer can assume silence
>> as a +1 on his patch.
>>
>
> I think this is part of the above commit policy so I wouldn't say this is
> needed.
>
>
>> - Voting for whether a commit should reflect documentation on Wiki.
>>
>
> Do you mean asking for documentation for some specific issues?
> We can probably discuss also that in a separate thread.
>
> Tommaso
>
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Suraj
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Hey all,
>> >
>> > We are seeing some conflicts between committers (especially me and
>> > Thomas?) and a growing number of somewhat arrogant, self-centred
>> > actions. However, I believe that all began with misunderstandings,
>> > misreadings, and insufficient discussions, (we didn't mean it). Let's
>> > don't argue anymore since everyone has different sides.
>> >
>> > Here's my suggestions:
>> >
>> > 1. The RoadMap should be discussed on dev@ and all decisions should be
>> > described on Wiki[1].
>> > 2. Observance of HowToCommit[2] is required of every committers.
>> >
>> > We might want to edit some plans/policies of RoadMap and HowToCommit.
>> > Please feel free to edit them.
>> >
>> > And, 3. Discussion in very polite terms.
>> >
>> > My only worry is whether we can be able to follow HowToCommit process
>> > everytime. As you know we're only have 3 active committers (= PMCs).
>> >
>> > Any other ideas?
>> >
>> > 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hama/RoadMap
>> > 2. http://wiki.apache.org/hama/HowToCommit
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> > @eddieyoon
>> >
>>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

Mime
View raw message