Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hama-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hama-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27E67D20C for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72499 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2012 10:32:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hama-dev-archive@hama.apache.org Received: (qmail 72448 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2012 10:32:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hama.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hama.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hama.apache.org Received: (qmail 72440 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2012 10:32:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:32:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of thomas.jungblut@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.54] (HELO mail-qa0-f54.google.com) (209.85.216.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:32:14 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j15so1460778qaq.13 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 02:31:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=JqvrC5piq53iF4+o9jdL5V7omHCV6qptbGfDrZ93iKQ=; b=tj8d0fvRuNH2KhTdgZT2Z/tY1MlhfBL8QDZXiG3RLhzFeNPxR4vtM6CfT0ezOL9bfh Tm+R11FWvGXES75sTqY38GdrBgUapP9gD1n/gPp5QUjX/f0fiv5vzkqaKnU4R9yIgcQ/ sJR47OqoPh5CxL+7OOa81/cd5ugWdPH4l9dNGvbMbEFusrUELc7sevGQKnW5tUZZBg/c PXlAYVlrsTpFBjpd3cDL+5DoSl2Y1snpvu0WsUFXaZOIIg2+scSDjuHB5xeNUW3C4Lit lYkVCYLTH/YTr21h0aUVPzTsDcwgnXESND9nnAfNjURVpMdScNUW8xPCdozgjvqqp6Jw vBIg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.210.202 with SMTP id gl10mr26105122qab.72.1355135513202; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 02:31:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.1.2 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 02:31:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:31:53 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: runtimePartitioning in GraphJobRunner From: Thomas Jungblut To: dev@hama.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300512b2e30e9404d07d1252 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf300512b2e30e9404d07d1252 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 uhm, I have no idea what you want to archieve, do you want to get back to client-side partitioning? 2012/12/10 Edward J. Yoon > If there's no opinion, I'll remove VertexInputReader in > GraphJobRunner, because it make code complex. Let's consider again > about the VertexInputReader, after fixing HAMA-531 and HAMA-632 > issues. > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Edward J. Yoon > wrote: > > Or, I'd like to get rid of VertexInputReader. > > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Edward J. Yoon > wrote: > >> In fact, there's no choice but to use runtimePartitioning (because of > >> VertexInputReader). Right? If so, I would like to delete all "if > >> (runtimePartitioning) {" conditions. > >> > >> -- > >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > >> @eddieyoon > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > > @eddieyoon > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon > --20cf300512b2e30e9404d07d1252--