Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hama.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hama.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of edward.yoon@oracle.com
 designates 141.146.126.227 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <5035DC2B.5000403@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:30:51 +0900
From: "Edward J. Yoon" <edward.yoon@oracle.com>
Organization: Oracle Corporation
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120421 Thunderbird/10.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@hama.apache.org
CC: Thomas Jungblut <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: K-means test scenario
References: 
 <CAGQgZQRcYkNhKbmX+R2iVD4j1LLAXuc8dUHyDh9k80TW2bRi1g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-=ysmhX9sG3zgM9OjGA19qQCh+-cc9N7zGkmUenjWwKnBXuQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJ-=ysmhX9sG3zgM9OjGA19qQCh+-cc9N7zGkmUenjWwKnBXuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thx.

Yes, not urgent but I'm awfully curious :-)

On 8/23/2012 4:27 PM, Thomas Jungblut wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yet another benchmark?^^ Just do the same stuff like you did last time.
> What I would find very interesting, is how much the disk caching comes into
> play in terms of performance. You can configure whether you want to cache
> the input in the heap or rely on OS disk caching.
>
> But don't hesitate, I don't think this is very urgent.
>
> 2012/8/23 Edward J. Yoon<edwardyoon@apache.org>
>
>> Hi thomas,
>>
>> I wanna test your k-means and evaluate its performance tomorrow.
>> What's the best scenario to test k-means?
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> @eddieyoon
>>

-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon