Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-hama-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-hama-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADBE2927B for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49175 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2012 08:18:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-hama-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49118 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2012 08:18:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hama-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hama-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49107 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2012 08:18:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 08:18:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.47] (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 08:18:35 +0000 Received: by vbbfr13 with SMTP id fr13so4402302vbb.6 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:18:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com designates 10.220.147.198 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.220.147.198; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com designates 10.220.147.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com; dkim=pass header.i=thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.220.147.198]) by 10.220.147.198 with SMTP id m6mr1249807vcv.49.1331021894552 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:18:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=oG9VOnECJUKw+ctAMBoYBP/yTHYvgV+Yk7I9bfikeYY=; b=qIN0qCFJLL6xuBaazgyuKrKjlWfxdroJngqHTf8t/e7Q6px2h0gXPuuJHU2LwINfUg rcf/p7shuZH9+aiiwZKhOCWMXN98iauMSbNLt85mMxeS7uN+ZpC7xN9XNAuaHH58+n5n KJH+aGBsKZ/td+LZWwQo9+8NxTqAMKYXBpZLeygDXKYHXUZZ/MDbgaodGcjdiUQnlQGm dMIT8hY83nME9S/7fJb+a0feUVk+OZfFFDueK0kkmlD8ZD7vtQwkwuGAvVY1jLulqnqm Jx0cuJgY28N3+BdPOnfPBH8NeuB0reTqYSSs/sGzf8Fcttxn+31G63FIXihLJ2CFlqDM 2OtQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.147.198 with SMTP id m6mr1028079vcv.49.1331021894467; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:18:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.215.3 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:18:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:18:14 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cutting a release 0.5-incubating From: Thomas Jungblut To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54fbbba3541a904ba8eafc6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec54fbbba3541a904ba8eafc6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have to admit that I never thought that Suraj is going to take over all the issues. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-505 2/4 is done, and I guess there will be a fifth with the real rollback. I wanted to target June/Juli, which is 5-6 months since we actually planned to release 0.4.0. I think the harmony with our surroundings and environment is important. > Well actually you are right- Am 6. M=E4rz 2012 09:14 schrieb Edward J. Yoon : > If it takes 5 ~ 6 months[1], then we can release 0.5 in the autumn or > winter of this year. > > I'm not talking about Incubator Graduation. I think the harmony with > our surroundings and environment is important. Someone want to use > Graph APIs, other people want to use with Hadoop 0.20.205, In my case > I want to use Hama on Clouds, and Whirr/Bigtop teams are go faster > than us. > > 1. http://markmail.org/message/ziviktlm7yjihvew > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Thomas Jungblut > wrote: > > Jukka told us recently that there is no technical requirement for > > graduation. > > However, the attention we get should be well used. > > We should target people that use Hama in production use and they really > > need some fault tolerance. (I plan it to use as well once we upgraded t= o > > YARN). > > > > Based on the new features we implemented in this few weeks, we could > slice > > a new release yes. > > But I don't see fault tolerance (at least checkpoint recovery) as a new > > feature rather than a must-have improvement. > > > > We have delayed the fault tolerance for now 2 releases, why delay it > > further? > > > > Am 6. M=E4rz 2012 08:56 schrieb Edward J. Yoon : > > > >> Agree. > >> > >> Sorry for my short mail, I was mean about new features. I think, we've > >> added enough new features (MSG Compressor, Avro RPC, and Graph API > >> package). > >> > >> Should we must add checkpoint recovery to 0.5 road-map? > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Thomas Jungblut > >> wrote: > >> > Hy, > >> > > >> > we haven't released 0.4.0 at all yet, so why don't we wait for bug > >> reports > >> > or feedback? > >> > > >> > Am 6. M=E4rz 2012 01:14 schrieb Edward J. Yoon : > >> > > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> What do you think about cutting a release 0.5-incubating with MSG > >> >> Compressor, Avro RPC, and Graph API package new features and Suppor= t > >> >> Hadoop 1.0? > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > >> >> @eddieyoon > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Thomas Jungblut > >> > Berlin > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > >> @eddieyoon > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Thomas Jungblut > > Berlin > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon > --=20 Thomas Jungblut Berlin --bcaec54fbbba3541a904ba8eafc6--