hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardy...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Hadoop 1.0.0 and 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT
Date Wed, 01 Feb 2012 03:19:28 GMT
BTW, should we release yarn with 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT?

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Thomas Jungblut
<thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe we can just version-up simply until we reach version 1.0.
>> And, I'd like to focus more on Hadoop 1.0 and release Hama 1.0 on top
>> of Hadoop 1.0.
>> AFAIK, 0.21 and 0.22 releases are unpopular. We may want to release
>> just Hama 2.0 for Hadoop 2.0.
>
>
> Yes, this sounds reasonable.
>
> 2012/1/31 Chia-Hung Lin <clin4j@googlemail.com>
>
>> +1
>>
>> And as Thomas mentioned that sticking to the stable release looks
>> safer for us in maintenance.
>>
>> On 31 January 2012 11:13, Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Maybe we can just version-up simply until we reach version 1.0.
>> >
>> > And, I'd like to focus more on Hadoop 1.0 and release Hama 1.0 on top
>> > of Hadoop 1.0.
>> >
>> > AFAIK, 0.21 and 0.22 releases are unpopular. We may want to release
>> > just Hama 2.0 for Hadoop 2.0.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Thomas Jungblut
>> > <thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >> Yes. But I very much doubt that it works without any changes.
>> >>
>> >> There is
>> >> - 20.2 (legacy stable) which we fully support with Hama 0.4.0.
>> >> - 0.20.203, 0.20.204, 0.20.205 which should work with Hama 0.4.0 as
>> well.
>> >> But we have to test this.
>> >> - 21.0 I don't believe that anyone runs on this. However Hama may not
>> run
>> >> on this as well.
>> >> - 22.0 and 1.0, I think both of them won't work.
>> >> - 23.0 we have YARN.
>> >>
>> >> We'll see. From a critical point of view, we have two subreleases.
>> Better
>> >> would if we can somehow make Hama 0.4.1 work on 21 and 22.
>> >>
>> >> In my opinion we should always stick with the latest stable release,
>> which
>> >> is  *0.20.203. *
>> >> And the question is how they think they proceed with the releases. On
>> the
>> >> common roadmap I see 1.1.0 and 0.22.1, as well as 24.0.
>> >>
>> >> 2012/1/26 Chia-Hung Lin <clin4j@googlemail.com>
>> >>
>> >>> If there is not difference between 0.4.0 and 0.4.1, perhaps
>> >>> maintaining 1 version (e.g. 0.4.0 + hadoop 1.0 or 0.4.0 + 0.20.2)
>> >>> would be a bit easier for us.
>> >>>
>> >>> On 25 January 2012 17:15, Thomas Jungblut
>> >>> <thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > What if we ship different Hama versions with different Hadoop
>> versions?
>> >>> > let's say 0.4.0 ships with 20.2, 0.4.1 with Hadoop 1.0.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > What should we do with yarn?
>> >>> > I believe that we should just pack the jar, so people can try it
out.
>> >>> > We also should flag this as ALPHA, I don't believe my work is stable.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 2012/1/25 Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>:
>> >>> >> +1
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> 2012/1/25 Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>> Let's release 0.4 incubating with hadoop 0.20.2 and switch
the
>> trunk
>> >>> >>> to Hadoop 1.0 based.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Edward J. Yoon <
>> edwardyoon@apache.org>
>> >>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> >>> > Hi all,
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > When we release 0.4-incubating, should we use hadoop
1.0.0? and
>> >>> should
>> >>> >>> > yarn module be included with 0.23.0-SNAPSHOT?
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>> > --
>> >>> >>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> >>> >>> > @eddieyoon
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> --
>> >>> >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> >>> >>> @eddieyoon
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > Thomas Jungblut
>> >>> > Berlin
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Thomas Jungblut
>> >> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> > @eddieyoon
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Jungblut
> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

Mime
View raw message