hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Jungblut <thomas.jungb...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Review then commit
Date Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:36:26 GMT
Totally great, thanks ChiaHung.
I hope we will use it ;)

2011/10/6 Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>

> Great!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 2011. 10. 6., at 오후 6:03, "ChiaHung Lin" <chl501@nuk.edu.tw> wrote:
>
> > I apply for setting up group hama in Apache review board.
> > And now it should be able to be found at https://reviews.apache.org/Group area.
> >
> > -----Original message-----
> > From:Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>
> > To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org,chl501@nuk.edu.tw
> > Date:Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:57:21 +0900
> > Subject:Re: Review then commit
> >
> >>> . I would like this (at least +1 from a comitter) to be part of our
> review-commit process.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > 2011/10/4 ChiaHung Lin <chl501@nuk.edu.tw>:
> >> Hadoop's practice looks good. I would like this (at least +1 from a
> comitter) to be part of our review-commit process.
> >>
> >> -----Original message-----
> >> From:Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@hortonworks.com>
> >> To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Date:Sat, 1 Oct 2011 11:15:06 +0530
> >> Subject:Re: Review then commit
> >>
> >> Apache has the review board: https://reviews.apache.org
> >>
> >> Back in Hadoop, we get things via uploading patches to the JIRA issues,
> >> requiring one single +1 from a committer for the patch to go in.
> >>
> >> +vinod
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Thomas Jungblut <
> >> thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1, review tool seems to be a good thing. Do we have something similar
> in
> >>> the Apache environment?
> >>>
> >>> 2011/9/28 ChiaHung Lin <chl501@nuk.edu.tw>
> >>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> But in what way are we going to perform such tasks/ procedure?
> >>>>
> >>>> Given a quick search on the internet, there are several tools and
> methods
> >>>> employed for this procedure:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1.) httpd has voting system that if 3 other developers gave positive
> (+1)
> >>>> vote and there are no negative (-1) vote[1].
> >>>>
> >>>> 2.) some linux kernel sub systems use patchwork[2] which tracks/
> reports
> >>>> patches series.
> >>>>
> >>>> 3.) Google internally uses Mondrian for code review, which has an open
> >>>> source version released as Rietveld[3].
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]. Patch Review Processes in Open Source Software Development
> >>>> Communities: A Comparative Case Study.
> >>>> http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/HICSS.2007.426
> >>>>
> >>>> [2]. Reducing your patch workload with Patchwork.
> >>>> http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2011/ocw/proposals/255
> >>>>
> >>>> [3]. Mondrian: Code Review on the Web.
> >>>>
> http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/downloads/detail?name=Mondrian2006.pdf
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original message-----
> >>>> From:Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>
> >>>> To:hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>> Date:Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:41:06 +0200
> >>>> Subject:Re: Review then commit
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 for me
> >>>> Tommaso
> >>>>
> >>>> 2011/9/27 Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hama committers are on the increase. So it's time to consider the
> >>>>> development process.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Typically, many apache projects adopt a review-then-commit process.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >>>>> @eddieyoon
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> ChiaHung Lin
> >>>> Department of Information Management
> >>>> National University of Kaohsiung
> >>>> Taiwan
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Thomas Jungblut
> >>> Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> ChiaHung Lin
> >> Department of Information Management
> >> National University of Kaohsiung
> >> Taiwan
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> > @eddieyoon
> >
> >
> > --
> > ChiaHung Lin
> > Department of Information Management
> > National University of Kaohsiung
> > Taiwan
>



-- 
Thomas Jungblut
Berlin <thomas.jungblut@gmail.com>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message