hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Thomas Jungblut (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HAMA-457) Refactoring of BSPPeerImpl
Date Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:46:10 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13130475#comment-13130475

Thomas Jungblut commented on HAMA-457:

Two questions though:
Should we open a review for it?


I TODO'd that the zookeeper client could be an abstract class. Then we could implement a fast
barrier sync like goldenorb and try different "algorithms" within the zookeeper.
Would you prefer this? Or is the current implementation the way to go?
> Refactoring of BSPPeerImpl
> --------------------------
>                 Key: HAMA-457
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-457
>             Project: Hama
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.3.0
>            Reporter: Thomas Jungblut
>            Assignee: Thomas Jungblut
>             Fix For: 0.4.0
>         Attachments: HAMA-457.patch, HAMA-457_v2.patch
> Extract a sync service which allows the user to implement and configure their own services.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message