hama-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ChiaHung Lin (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (HAMA-439) Reorganize modules for YARN/MR-NextGen integration
Date Mon, 19 Sep 2011 02:42:08 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107594#comment-13107594
] 

ChiaHung Lin commented on HAMA-439:
-----------------------------------

+1 

Are this going to be changed in branch first? Or would it be applied both in trunk and branch?
Just want to check how to ensure the stability of the progress because at the moment we have
other issues and code in trunk is changing (a lot) as well. 



> Reorganize modules for YARN/MR-NextGen integration
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAMA-439
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-439
>             Project: Hama
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>
> I'd like to get started on HamaV2 to work with YARN/MR-nextgen.
> Here's what I think should be the module structure:
>  - *api*: Code from HamaV1 related to APIs that will be moved to this new module. This
will mainly have the BSP APIs: _BSP_, _BSPPeerInterface_ and all the related records like
_BSPMessage_, _BSPMessageBundle etc.
>  - *core*: Current/HamaV1 server code. Will have the current _BSPMaster_/_GroomServer_
infrastructure. We should probably rename it to {{classic-server}} or something similar.
>  - *server*: New Hama server implementation to work with YARN. Will have _BSPApplicationMaster_,
_BSPTask_ and related code.
>  - *client*: Code from HamaV1 related to client that will be moved to this new module.
This will mainly have the client-submission classes/interfaces like _BSPJob_, _BSPJobClient_,
_JobStatus_ etc. It will be configurable to either run with the classic-server implementation
or with YARN.
> There will not be any package changes but only code-moves across modules, so we will
be backwards compatible.
> How does it look? Any thoughts/suggestions?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message