Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-hama-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-hama-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA634793C for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16883 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2011 13:42:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-hama-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 16839 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2011 13:42:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hama-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hama-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 16831 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2011 13:42:47 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:42:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-yi0-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username edwardyoon, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:42:46 +0000 Received: by yia28 with SMTP id 28so723236yia.6 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 06:42:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.133.70 with SMTP id hx6mr999620icc.134.1313588557527; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 06:42:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.13.71 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 06:42:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:42:37 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Discussion] Task Priority/Goals From: "Edward J. Yoon" To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Okay so you going to focus on HAMA-410 Edward? P.S., Yes~ On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: >> We should keep the release-timing up and make our next release before 2012 >> (IMO). > > I think so. > >> And in general we should focus a bit more on algebraic computation, this >> isn't possible with giraph and can be very helpful. > > Our goal is clear. IMO, we should focus on easy-to-use system in the short-term. > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Thomas Jungblut > wrote: >> Okay so you going to focus on HAMA-410 Edward? >> After that Whirr stuff I'll take care of HAMA-409, it would be great if >> Miklos is going to help me a bit if he has time :) >> We should keep the release-timing up and make our next release before 2012 >> (IMO). >> >> And in general we should focus a bit more on algebraic computation, this >> isn't possible with giraph and can be very helpful. >> >> 2011/8/17 Edward J. Yoon >> >>> HAMA-410 must be fixed and tested before release 0.4.0. It's heavily >>> related with other many next issues I think e.g., InputOutput system, >>> Fault tolerant, ..., .etc. >>> >>> If that architecture is not good, we should re-implement it. >>> >>> Miklos, How's HAMA-409 going? >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Jungblut >>> wrote: >>> > Hey guys, >>> > >>> > I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which >>> order. >>> > And maybe what our goals are for the next monts. >>> > >>> > We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee: >>> > - HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward) >>> > - HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me) >>> > - Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199 >>> > >>> > What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release? >>> > >>> > I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+ >>> > committers, 3+ PPMC members". >>> > >>> > Where do you see us in 3-4 months? >>> > >>> > Best regards, >>> > Thomas >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>> @eddieyoon >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thomas Jungblut >> Berlin >> >> mobile: 0170-3081070 >> >> business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de >> private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon