Mailing-List: contact hama-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJ-=ysk9FiQZoFRyOURY__BvRenz=up36CKjtCA49MeCt94+TA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAJ-=ysk9FiQZoFRyOURY__BvRenz=up36CKjtCA49MeCt94+TA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:50:38 +0900
Message-ID: 
 <CAGQgZQQZjjGd8dWNWv00ug_EWNxAroea9pgQwxs1w81eL30tqg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Task Priority/Goals
From: "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardyoon@apache.org>
To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

HAMA-410 must be fixed and tested before release 0.4.0. It's heavily
related with other many next issues I think e.g., InputOutput system,
Fault tolerant, ..., .etc.

If that architecture is not good, we should re-implement it.

Miklos, How's HAMA-409 going?

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Jungblut
<thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I guess we have to speak about what we want to do next and in which order.
> And maybe what our goals are for the next monts.
>
> We have 3 larger tasks in the Pipe and their assignee:
> - HAMA-410 Multiple Tasks per Groom (Edward)
> - HAMA-409 Pregel API (Miklos, Edward, me)
> - Fault Tolerance and various subtasks, e.G. HAMA-199
>
> What are our plans for the next months and 0.4.0 release?
>
> I saw Edward already tweet about several project goals like "new 5+
> committers, 3+ PPMC members".
>
> Where do you see us in 3-4 months?
>
> Best regards,
> Thomas
>


-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon