Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-hama-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-hama-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB2206363 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 07:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64869 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 07:45:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-hama-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64821 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2011 07:45:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hama-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hama-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64813 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2011 07:45:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 07:45:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of thomas.jungblut@googlemail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 07:45:28 +0000 Received: by vxd7 with SMTP id 7so3041884vxd.6 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:45:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/bls/Fli+AnYBTF7aeHoo1dpQze143Luady7v/55wo0=; b=SNG7z0Lq+HnQ1tO7MGhDb0V+te5W2E+yNJpMq1tPQxXSVl75nthFfLyNjoRp14Txwz RzDLnN8AN+q1jSJctds0a53QBT2rUIOpubIL2D8Wa+UiY0c1eIBkgb7z0BAIdDlhg5Eq gyoBGVFBHlLuIDa78oJ1fNkmoGm5BrWLA9J6M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=B462XfB+NL6a1f9nvaUGP3CWBfocT37imjQHbGjoDDvAnDvvT3RCexWg9I4rEITQoQ Ryo7wHiraNlu/t3bvIIiHy2QG2kXLOss1406+gGCyxTIxGjcdA7qtbG/CSqVIExQS+Kv G0R2reDxus1zYuuq0pETWwr4N37mN9doVmkN8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.74.68 with SMTP id r4mr702606vdv.221.1307778307567; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.101.166 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:45:07 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Package Layout & Message class conventions From: Thomas Jungblut To: hama-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec501667177ae7504a56addb3 --bcaec501667177ae7504a56addb3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey all, I think we can improve our package layout to clean up the BSP package. For example we could put the Message model classes and the task related classes into their own package. And I would like to state some conventions on the message classes. So for example we have a primitive like a boolean, the message would be called BooleanMessage. So the data part is a boolean and the tag is a string. If we are changing the tag to a non-string class we are using a combined name like IntegerDoubleMessage. So the tag part is an integer, the data part is a double. What do you think? -- Thomas Jungblut Berlin mobile: 0170-3081070 business: thomas.jungblut@testberichte.de private: thomas.jungblut@gmail.com --bcaec501667177ae7504a56addb3--