hadoop-zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stack <st...@duboce.net>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup
Date Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:24:34 GMT
We're working on hbase 0.21 as being the first hbase that shows up in
a maven repo.
St.Ack

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Mahadev Konar <mahadev@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately no.. We are planning to deploy 3.3 as the first version on
> maven repo.
>
>
> Thanks
> mahadev
>
>
> On 1/22/10 12:58 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is ZK 3.2.2 in a maven repository somewhere?
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Drew Farris <drew.farris@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:47 AM
>> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup
>> To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>> Neither hbase 0.20.2 nor zookeeper (any version) appear to be in a
>> maven repo at this point, so Mahout would have to roll and deploy
>> these. What was the process that was followed to build and deploy the
>> mahout-packaged hadoop 0.20.1 and hbase artifacts? Is this something I
>> could submit a patch to Mahout for, or better left for the committers?
>>
>> As Ted pointed out, yes the release of zk is 3.2.2
>>
>> Drew
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:12 AM, zhao zhendong <zhaozhendong@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Drew,
>>>
>>> I propose to
>>> 1) update hbase-0.20.0.jar to hbase-0.20.2.jar due to the later is stable
>>> and hbased-platform is based on this version,
>>>
>>> 2) and add zookeeper-3.2.1.jar.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Zhendong
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, zhao zhendong <zhaozhendong@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Drew,
>>>>
>>>> Including a source code in snapshots that will be great.
>>>>
>>>> Currently, the HDFS reader does not work in 0.20.2. Without source code,
>>>> it's not convenient for me to debug the code.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Zhendong
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Drew Farris <drew.farris@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if we can get the hadoop people to include source jars with
>>>>> their snapshots?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I need a fix after 0.20.1, that's the primary reason. As a bonus,
we
>>>>>> don't have to maintain our own version. The downside is relying on
a
>>>>>> SNAPSHOT, but seems worth it to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:02 PM, zhao zhendong <zhaozhendong@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Thanks Drew,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for me to maintain a stable hadoop release, such as 0.20.1.
The
>>>>> reason is
>>>>>>> obvious :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Zhendong
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim)
>>>>
>>>> <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Department of Computer Science
>>>> School of Computing
>>>> National University of Singapore
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<<
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim)
>>>
>>> <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>>
>>>
>>> Department of Computer Science
>>> School of Computing
>>> National University of Singapore
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<<
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message