hadoop-zookeeper-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Windows port of ZK C api
Date Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:01:40 GMT
Notice that buildbot now has windows 7 support:
http://ci.apache.org/buildbot.html
also I notice that hudson has windows 2008 server
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/computer/windows1/

We should see if we can get ZK up on these to help with compatibility
testing. Would be nice to catch cygwin as well - note that we support
unix/cygwin today (although it's been a while since anyone tried
cygwin afaik).

Any interest in adding support for cmake? (the benefit of cmake is
that it can generate native build environment, VS project for windows,
makefiles for unix, etc...)

Patrick

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Fournier, Camille F. [Tech]
<Camille.Fournier@gs.com> wrote:
> Thanks Mahadev. We are using those C# bindings but also need native windows C/C++. Every
language all the time!
>
> C
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mahadev Konar [mailto:mahadev@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 11:06 AM
> To: zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Windows port of ZK C api
>
> Hi Camille,
>  I think definitely there is. I think a build script with a set of
> requirements and a nice set of docs on how to start using it would be great.
> BTW, there is a C# binding which someone wrote earlier
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/ZKClientBindings
>
> You can take a look at that and see if you want to extend that or write your
> own.
>
> Thanks
> mahadev
>
>
> On 11/3/10 7:18 AM, "Fournier, Camille F. [Tech]" <Camille.Fournier@gs.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> We have a requirement for a native windows-compatible version of the ZK C api.
>> We're currently working on various ways to do this port, but would very much
>> like to submit this back to you all when we are finished so that we don't have
>> to maintain the code ourselves through future releases. Is there interest in
>> having this? What would you need with this patch (build scripts, etc) to
>> accept it?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Camille
>>
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message