hadoop-zookeeper-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vishal K <vishalm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: QA effort to support windows as a production platform
Date Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:35:58 GMT
Hi Patrick,

I will check if the servers are underprovisioned. I have one cluster with 1
windows server + 2 Linux servers. I will submit the patch for the tests.
Thanks.

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On 04/09/2010 07:01 AM, Vishal K wrote:
>
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> So far I have done the following:
>>
>> 1. Ran junit tests on both windows and Linux. I ran into few issues with
>> the
>> tests: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-734. Also, the
>> path
>> to dataDir in zoo.cfg should be either UNIX-style path or should contain
>> double backslashes instead of one. I think the path compatiblity issue is
>> the only bug found so far. I was a big skeptical earlier about the junit
>> test results since the logs of the junit tests on Windows differ from that
>> on linux. But as you mentioned in your earlier reply it is probably
>> difference in networking libraries (I am using the same java version on
>> both).
>>
>>
> Ok, great. I've slated 734 for 3.3.1/3.4.0. If you'd like to contribute a
> patch please feel free (you need to submit as an attachment rather than
> inlining in the desc, see this link for details):
> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/HowToContribute
>
>
> 2. Created a 1 Windows + 2 Linux cluster. Did some hand testing and things
>> seem to work fine.
>>
>>
> 3 distinct clusters you mean or 3 servers; 1 on windows and 2 on linux?
> (that would be a interesting test btw :-) )
>
>
> 3. I tried to run smoketest on the cluster, but I had some issues with the
>> test. I will be trying to run this test again soon.
>>
>>
> Ben has been out of the office, once he gets back he's the best person to
> shed light. If you have specific questions someone else might be able to
> shed light in the mean time.
>
>
> 4. I tried systest and generateLoad test. systest passed but generateLoad
>> test started spewing a lot of connection/session closed exceptions.
>>
>>
> You might be underprovisioning the server(s)? Try monitoring the servers
> while running the test. You can use something like
> http://github.com/phunt/zktop
> esp the "min/avg/max latency" information.
>
> My experience on windows is that the IO is not as good as unix (esp going
> through java). You should def. test under some load (using the latency
> tester as I mentioned earlier, simliar to my tests on the wiki) to ensure
> that the system will function in this environment. Ensure that you have
> enough heap, you might need to tune the GC to turn on cms/incremental GC
> (that could also be the issue you saw earlier), and also monitor the disk
> activity.
>
> Btw, have you tested the 4 letter words? stat and such I mean. Would be
> good to verify as well as they are critical for monitoring the system once
> in production.
>
>
> I hope to run systest, generateloadtest, smoktest and latencytest. If we
>> decide to go with the ZK on windows, then we will also write our own tests
>> (and do more rigorous QA). I will be happy to add these to the ZK test
>> suite
>> as well.
>>
>
> Great, happy to have them. See the how to contribute link above.
>
>
> I believe at the end of this exercise we will have fair amount of
>> confidence
>> in ZK on windows. I will keep you posted.
>>
>
> That will be great. Having an actual user who's running in production under
> that configuration would bring even more weight.
>
> At some point we should look into the C client side of things as well. That
> will be harder, but if we can do it it would mean that python/perl/etc...
> would also be available for the platform.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Patrick Hunt<phunt@apache.org>  wrote:
>>
>> Vishal, in general how are things going with your windows evaluation? Can
>>> you give a short review of what you've tested, what's working and what
>>> you
>>> still would like to look at? You are testing under windows directly,
>>> correct? (not cygwin I mean). Any chance you will be able to test the c,
>>> python and/or perl bindings? (although this would mean porting to windows
>>> compiler if i understand correctly).
>>>
>>> We should consider updating the documentation to include detail about
>>> windows support if you feel comfortable. Enter a JIRA for this if you
>>> agree.
>>> Perhaps a wiki page detailing status and any issues running on that
>>> platform
>>> might also be useful? It would be great to offer (with confidence) ZK to
>>> users of the windows platform.
>>>
>>> Thanks for taking on this effort, regards,
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/08/2010 03:21 PM, Vishal K wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi Patrick, Mahadev,
>>>> I was going through the logs of junit tests (all of the tests passed). I
>>>> noticed the logs for windows are different from the logs on linux.
>>>> On windows, the logs show following "Failed to send last message" error
>>>> message several times. None of the logs on Linux have them.
>>>> Are these messages normal? I have also attached the log file for the
>>>> AsyncHammerTest.
>>>> 2010-04-08 18:07:35,750 - WARN
>>>> [Thread-80:QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker@586] - Exception when using
>>>> channel: 4
>>>> java.nio.channels.ClosedChannelException
>>>>  at
>>>> sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.ensureWriteOpen(SocketChannelImpl.java:126)
>>>>  at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.write(SocketChannelImpl.java:324)
>>>>  at
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker.send(QuorumCnxManager.java:548)
>>>>  at
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker.run(QuorumCnxManager.java:578)
>>>> 2010-04-08 18:07:35,750 - WARN
>>>> [Thread-80:QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker@589] - Send worker leaving
>>>> thread
>>>> 2010-04-08 18:07:35,750 - WARN
>>>> [Thread-95:QuorumCnxManager$RecvWorker@658] - Connection broken:
>>>> java.io.IOException: Channel eof
>>>>  at
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumCnxManager$RecvWorker.run(QuorumCnxManager.java:630)
>>>> 2010-04-08 18:07:35,750 - ERROR
>>>> [Thread-92:QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker@559] - Failed to send last
>>>> message. Shutting down thread.
>>>> java.nio.channels.ClosedChannelException
>>>>  at
>>>> sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.ensureWriteOpen(SocketChannelImpl.java:126)
>>>>  at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.write(SocketChannelImpl.java:324)
>>>>  at
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker.send(QuorumCnxManager.java:548)
>>>>  at
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker.run(QuorumCnxManager.java:557)
>>>> 2010-04-08 18:07:35,750 - WARN
>>>> [Thread-92:QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker@589] - Send worker leaving threa
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> -Vishal
>>>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Patrick Hunt<phunt@apache.org
>>>> <mailto:phunt@apache.org>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    I can't tell for certain. Looking a bit closer the code that starts
>>>>    the server for the c tests does reference the clover jar, so my
>>>>    guess would be that it does, but the messages from clover and the
>>>>    build, etc.. don't shed any light. I didn't setup the zk clover
>>>>    stuff for hudson, cc'ing Giri who might have insight.
>>>>
>>>>    Patrick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    On 04/07/2010 02:34 PM, Vishal K wrote:
>>>>
>>>>        Hi Patrick,
>>>>        We are not using C clients so we are not worried about porting
>>>>        them to
>>>>        Windows. Just out of curiosity, is there any way to confirm if
>>>>        the code
>>>>        coverage results are a result of test-core-java. If not, I will
>>>>        run the
>>>>        coverage tools locally.
>>>>        I had tried the smoketests earlier, but I ran into some issues
>>>>        there. I
>>>>        forgot to note down the problem. I will revisit and upload the
>>>>        results.
>>>>        Thanks for your help.
>>>>
>>>>        On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Patrick Hunt<phunt@apache.org
>>>>        <mailto:phunt@apache.org>
>>>>         <mailto:phunt@apache.org<mailto:phunt@apache.org>>>
 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>            On 04/07/2010 01:51 PM, Vishal K wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                Hi Mahadev,
>>>>
>>>>                Thanks for your response. Currently I am running ZK
>>>> without
>>>>                cygwin on
>>>>                windows. I will give it a try on cygwin. I am not quite
>>>>        familiar
>>>>                with
>>>>                cppunit. Why will cppinit give me more confidence in
>>>>        native windows
>>>>                libraries?
>>>>
>>>>                I have few more questions relevant to testing:
>>>>                1. How much code coverage do we get with
>>>>        "test-core-java"? I see
>>>>                68.8%
>>>>                coverage on hudson
>>>>
>>>> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/clover/.
>>>>                  Does
>>>>                this measure the coverage from junit tests run from
>>>>        "test-core-java"?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>            Right, afaik that's test-core-java.
>>>>
>>>>            I think if you plan to run in production under windows you
>>>> would
>>>>            want to run in win, not cygwin. If that's the case you'd have
>>>> to
>>>>            port the c client and c client tests to some windows
>>>>        specific compiler.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                2. What would be a good and reliable set of tests that
>>>>        will help
>>>>                me verify
>>>>                that the cluster holding up fine on windows. I tried to
>>>> run
>>>>                systest and
>>>>                generateload. But I am having issues with the tests (and
>>>>        also
>>>>                understanding
>>>>                the output of the tests since I am not familiar with the
>>>>                source). The
>>>>                systest did exit with output something ilke Test OK (1).
>>>> I
>>>>                presume this is a
>>>>                good sign :-) generateLoad crashed and I will look into
>>>> it
>>>>                later. Please let
>>>>                me know if you have any suggestions. Last few lines are
>>>>        shown below:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>            Well the best thing would be to run one's own tests for their
>>>>            specific use cases. Short of that you've done the core set
>>>>        of tests
>>>>            that we have available to us. You might try the
>>>>        smoke/latency tests:
>>>>        http://github.com/phunt/zk-smoketest
>>>>            in particular you can run the latency tests from a number of
>>>>        clients
>>>>            in parallel and see the results.
>>>>        http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/ServiceLatencyOverview
>>>>
>>>>            Patrick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                2010-04-07 14:44:20,055 - WARN
>>>>                  [QuorumPeer:/0.0.0.0:3155:QuorumPeer@662] -
>>>>                QuorumPeer main thread exited
>>>>                Got rc = -4
>>>>                Got rc = -4
>>>>                [many such messages as above]
>>>>                WatchedEvent state:Disconnected type:None path:null
>>>>                java.lang.InterruptedException: sleep interrupted
>>>>                         at java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method)
>>>>                         at
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  org.apache.zookeeper.test.system.GenerateLoad$GeneratorInstance$SenderThread.run(GenerateLoad.java:425)
>>>>                java.lang.InterruptedException
>>>>                         at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
>>>>                         at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:485)
>>>>                         at
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  org.apache.zookeeper.test.system.GenerateLoad$GeneratorInstance$ZooKeeperThread.incOutstanding(GenerateLoad.java:305)
>>>>                         at
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  org.apache.zookeeper.test.system.GenerateLoad$GeneratorInstance$ZooKeeperThread.run(GenerateLoad.java:353)
>>>>
>>>>                2010-04-07 14:44:20,711 - INFO
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  [Thread-42-SendThread(vkher-devd:3155):ClientCnxn$SendThread@1000
>>>> ]
>>>>                - Opening
>>>>                socket connection to server<host>/<IP>:48214
>>>>                Got rc = -4
>>>>                2010-04-07 14:44:22,008 - INFO  [Thread-42:ZooKeeper@538
>>>> ]
>>>> -
>>>>                Session:0x127d97600cc0000 closed
>>>>
>>>>                Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>                Regards,
>>>>                -Vishal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Mahadev
>>>>                Konar<mahadev@yahoo-inc.com
>>>>        <mailto:mahadev@yahoo-inc.com>  <mailto:mahadev@yahoo-inc.com
>>>>
>>>>        <mailto:mahadev@yahoo-inc.com>>>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                    HI Vishal,
>>>>                      I would be a good think to actually get cppunit
>>>>        working on
>>>>                    windows (rather
>>>>                    than dropping it) since it would make you more
>>>>        confident on
>>>>                    being able to
>>>>                    use the native libraries for windows.
>>>>
>>>>                    Though there is already an open jira to try and
>>>> compile
>>>>                    librarires without
>>>>                    CPPIUNIT being installed on the machines.
>>>>
>>>>        http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-316
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                    Would you want to try and take a shot at fixing the
>>>>        cppunit
>>>>                    tests?
>>>>
>>>>                    Would be great to have cppunit tests working on
>>>> cygwin!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                    Thanks
>>>>                    mahadev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                    On 4/6/10 4:15 PM, "Vishal K"<vishalmlst@gmail.com
>>>>        <mailto:vishalmlst@gmail.com>
>>>>        <mailto:vishalmlst@gmail.com<mailto:vishalmlst@gmail.com>>>
>>>>
>>>>          wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                        Hi,
>>>>
>>>>                        I had few minor problems (
>>>>        https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-734)
>>>>                        after which all
>>>>
>>>>                    junits
>>>>
>>>>                        passed (I ran ant test-java-core).
>>>>
>>>>                        But the build failed later in
>>>>        create-cppunit-configure:
>>>>
>>>>                        -------------
>>>>                        test-core-java:
>>>>                        call-test-cppunit:
>>>>                        init:
>>>>                        check-cppunit-makefile:
>>>>                        create-cppunit-makefile:
>>>>                        init:
>>>>                        check-cppunit-configure:
>>>>                        create-cppunit-configure:
>>>>                             [mkdir] Created dir:
>>>>
>>>>  C:\zookeeper\zookeeper-3.3.0\build\test\test-cppunit
>>>>                        BUILD FAILED
>>>>                        C:\zookeeper\zookeeper-3.3.0\build.xml:907: The
>>>>                        following error occurred
>>>>                        while executing this line:
>>>>                        C:\zookeeper\zookeeper-3.3.0\build.xml:865: The
>>>>                        following error occurred
>>>>                        while executing this line:
>>>>                        C:\zookeeper\zookeeper-3.3.0\build.xml:857:
>>>>        Execute failed:
>>>>                        java.io.IOException: Cannot run program
>>>>        "C:\zookeeper\zookeeper-3.3.0\src\c\configure" (in directory
>>>>        "C:\zookeeper\zookeeper-3.3.0\build\test\test-cppunit"):
>>>>                        CreateProcess
>>>>                        error=193, %1 is not a valid Win32 application
>>>>                          at
>>>>        java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:459)
>>>>                          at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Runtime.java:593
>>>>                        -----------
>>>>                        cppunit tests should be probably dropped for
>>>>        windows.
>>>>
>>>>                        Also, one point to note the dataDir in zoo.cfg
>>>>        should
>>>>                        have UNIX path (or
>>>>                        double backslash instead of single backslash). I
>>>>        suppose
>>>>                        all Java
>>>>
>>>>                    developers
>>>>
>>>>                        might be already aware of that.
>>>>
>>>>                        Regards,
>>>>                        -Vishal
>>>>
>>>>                        On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Patrick
>>>>                        Hunt<phunt@apache.org<mailto:phunt@apache.org>
>>>>        <mailto:phunt@apache.org<mailto:phunt@apache.org>>>
  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                            Pretty seamless, just do a rolling upgrade
>>>>        (see the
>>>>                            faq) of the servers.
>>>>                            Then upgrade your clients. Code APIs on the
>>>>        client
>>>>                            are all b/w compat.
>>>>
>>>>                            Patrick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                            On 04/02/2010 10:41 AM, Vishal K wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                                Hi Patrick,
>>>>
>>>>                                We have not upgraded to 3.3.0 yet. We
>>>>        are using
>>>>                                3.2.2. I did notice the
>>>>                                windows specific batch files in 3.3.0.
>>>> How
>>>>                                seemless is upgrade from
>>>>
>>>>                    3.2.2
>>>>
>>>>                                -
>>>>
>>>>                                    3.3.0?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                I will let you know if I run into any
>>>>        windows
>>>>                                related problems. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>                                On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Patrick
>>>>                                Hunt<phunt@apache.org
>>>>        <mailto:phunt@apache.org>  <mailto:phunt@apache.org
>>>>
>>>>        <mailto:phunt@apache.org>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                      wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                Are you using 3.3.0? 3.3.0 included a
>>>>        number of
>>>>                                fixes for cygwin and
>>>>
>>>>                                    includes windows specific batch
>>>>        files. If
>>>>                                    you are planning to deploy
>>>>
>>>>                    to
>>>>
>>>>                                    production on windows I'd encourage
>>>>        you to
>>>>                                    develop under windows
>>>>
>>>>                    directly
>>>>
>>>>                                    as
>>>>                                    well.
>>>>
>>>>                                    If you find issues, bugs, etc... be
>>>>        sure to
>>>>                                    enter JIRAs. Don't worry,
>>>>
>>>>                    you
>>>>
>>>>                                    won't hurt our feelings, on the
>>>> contrary
>>>>                                    we'll be happy if you
>>>>
>>>>                    find/fix
>>>>
>>>>                                    issues on windows and make things
>>>>        better for
>>>>                                    everyone. (just make sure
>>>>                                    you
>>>>                                    are using the latest release).
>>>>
>>>>                                    Regards,
>>>>
>>>>                                    Patrick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                    On 04/02/2010 07:05 AM, Vishal K
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                                    Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                        I was able to start zookeeper on
>>>>        windows
>>>>                                        using cygwin. I had to do
>>>>
>>>>                    minor
>>>>
>>>>                                        changes to the shell scripts to
>>>> use
>>>>                                        cygpath wherever needed.
>>>>                                        I will run a few tests and post
>>>> the
>>>>                                        progress. I greped through the
>>>>                                        zookeeper
>>>>                                        sources just to check if ZK is
>>>>        using any
>>>>                                        native code.
>>>>                                        I didn't find any, but just to
>>>>        confirm -
>>>>                                        is ZK using native code.
>>>>
>>>>                                        I have talked to a few guys
>>>>        around and
>>>>                                        they said it is fair to assume
>>>>                                        that
>>>>                                        the programs are portable (to
>>>>        Windows)
>>>>                                        if they don't have native
>>>>
>>>>                    code.
>>>>
>>>>                                        Just
>>>>                                        wanted to check. Thanks.
>>>>                                        On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:09 AM,
>>>>        Vishal
>>>>                                        K<vishalmlst@gmail.com
>>>>        <mailto:vishalmlst@gmail.com>
>>>>        <mailto:vishalmlst@gmail.com<mailto:vishalmlst@gmail.com>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                        wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                                        Hi Patrick,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                            Thanks for your response. I
>>>>        start
>>>>                                            running ZK on windows and
>>>>        let you
>>>>                                            know
>>>>                                            if
>>>>                                            I run into issues.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                            On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at
>>>>        11:32 AM,
>>>>                                            Patrick
>>>>        Hunt<phunt@apache.org<mailto:phunt@apache.org>
>>>>        <mailto:phunt@apache.org<mailto:phunt@apache.org>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                            wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                            Vishal K wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                                We will be using
>>>>        zookeeper quite
>>>>                                                extensively for
>>>> clustering.
>>>>
>>>>                    Windows
>>>>
>>>>                                                is
>>>>
>>>>                                                    one
>>>>                                                    of the platforms
>>>>        that we may
>>>>                                                    need to support.
>>>>        Since Win32
>>>>                                                    is not
>>>>                                                    supported
>>>>                                                    as a production
>>>>        platform I
>>>>                                                    was wondering to
>>>>        what extent is
>>>>
>>>>                    zookeeper
>>>>
>>>>                                                    tested
>>>>                                                    on windows. We are
>>>> also
>>>>                                                    interested on using
>>>>                                                    Zookeeper on Win64
>>>>                                                    platform.
>>>>                                                    Is
>>>>                                                    Win64 supported? Are
>>>>        there
>>>>                                                    any plans to support
>>>>                                                    Win32/Win64 for
>>>>                                                    production?
>>>>                                                    If not, what would
>>>>        one need
>>>>                                                    to do support
>>>>        windows and
>>>>                                                    what would
>>>>
>>>>                    be
>>>>
>>>>                                                    the
>>>>                                                    estimated QA effort?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                                    My use of ZK is
>>>>        exclusively
>>>>                                                    32/64bit linux,
>>>>        however I
>>>>                                                    can tell you
>>>>
>>>>                                                that
>>>>                                                given that the
>>>>        client/server are
>>>>                                                implemented in java it
>>>>        should
>>>>
>>>>                    work.
>>>>
>>>>                                                Problems you might
>>>> encounter
>>>>                                                would be things like NIO
>>>>        issues with
>>>>
>>>>                    the
>>>>
>>>>                                                JVM
>>>>                                                implementation on
>>>> windows.
>>>>
>>>>                                                Testing on windows?
>>>>        Pretty much
>>>>                                                0 afaik. We do support
>>>>        development
>>>>
>>>>                    on
>>>>
>>>>                                                cygwin, so provides some
>>>>        basic
>>>>                                                exercising of the
>>>>        codepaths with the
>>>>                                                windows
>>>>                                                jvm, however it's not
>>>> likely
>>>>                                                production level qa.
>>>>
>>>>                                                This question (zk on
>>>>        win) has
>>>>                                                come up once or twice
>>>>        before, I
>>>>
>>>>                    haven't
>>>>
>>>>                                                seen
>>>>                                                any followup from the
>>>>        users who
>>>>                                                asked about it
>>>>        previously though.
>>>>
>>>>                                                3.3.0 has batch files for
>>>>                                                running the server in
>>>>        windows,
>>>>                                                give those
>>>>
>>>>                    a
>>>>
>>>>                                                try.
>>>>                                                Probably what you'd want
>>>>        to do
>>>>                                                is run "ant
>>>>        test-core-java" or
>>>>
>>>>                    similar
>>>>
>>>>                                                in
>>>>                                                the
>>>>                                                top of the ZK release
>>>>        directory.
>>>>                                                This will run all the
>>>>        java tests
>>>>
>>>>                    and
>>>>
>>>>                                                give
>>>>                                                you some insight into
>>>>        status.
>>>>                                                I'd be happy to work
>>>>        with you to
>>>>                                                land
>>>>                                                patches
>>>>                                                that address issues with
>>>>        ZK on
>>>>                                                windows. Depending on
>>>>        the interest
>>>>                                                level
>>>>                                                and
>>>>                                                support from win users
>>>>        we could
>>>>                                                support win as a
>>>>        dev/prod platform
>>>>
>>>>                    at
>>>>
>>>>                                                some
>>>>                                                point in the future -
>>>> having
>>>>                                                ongoing support for this
>>>>        would be
>>>>                                                important
>>>>                                                though (people interested
>>>> in
>>>>                                                testing/fixing under win
>>>> I
>>>>                                                mean). Try
>>>>                                                exercising under windows
>>>> and
>>>>                                                create some JIRAs based
>>>>        on what you
>>>>
>>>>                    find.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                                Regards,
>>>>
>>>>                                                Patrick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message