hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Konstantinos Karanasos (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-7682) Expose canAssign method in the PlacementConstraintManager
Date Wed, 03 Jan 2018 06:33:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16309205#comment-16309205

Konstantinos Karanasos commented on YARN-7682:

Thanks for the patch, [~pgaref]. Two main comments:
* I think that the functions you push in the getNodeCardinalityByOp should be reversed. That
is, I think when you have multiple tags, you should look at the highest cardinality one in
the node/rack, and your min cardinality of the constraint should be below that. Same for the
max cardinality of the constraint (should be above the min of the actual cardinalities of
the given tags). So essentially you would define your minScopeCardinality using the Long::max,
and your maxScopeCardinality using the Long::min. Then everything goes as is. You can also
make a check that your minScopeCardinality <= maxScopeCardinality, just to be on the safe
side. Does it make sense?
* Do we need the line right after the comment “// Make sure Anti-affinity satisfies hard
upper limit”?

* Let’s fill out the javadoc comments in canSatisfyConstraints
* In canSatisfySingleConstraintExpression the javadoc is a bit ambiguous. "The node or rack
should satisfy the constraints that are enabled by the given allocation tags". Also let’s
add javadoc comments for parameters its parameters (I know it is private, but it helps).
* In both methods you mention Node in the javadoc but you actually support RACK too.

If the above are fixed, +1 from me.

> Expose canAssign method in the PlacementConstraintManager
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: YARN-7682
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7682
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Arun Suresh
>            Assignee: Panagiotis Garefalakis
>         Attachments: YARN-7682-YARN-6592.001.patch, YARN-7682-YARN-6592.002.patch, YARN-7682-YARN-6592.003.patch,
> As per discussion in YARN-7613. Lets expose {{canAssign}} method in the PlacementConstraintManager
that takes a sourceTags, applicationId, SchedulerNode and AllocationTagsManager and returns
true if constraints are not violated by placing the container on the node.
> I prefer not passing in the SchedulingRequest, since it can have > 1 numAllocations.
We want this api to be called for single allocations.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org

View raw message