Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC90200CD0 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 20:34:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id DC3721674C1; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 371C51674BE for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 20:34:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 78057 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2017 18:34:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 77636 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2017 18:34:03 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:34:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A8BFD180839 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:34:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dIdDThzheyw5 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3C6E85F613 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8770CE0D54 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3F56A23F05 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:34:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sunil G (JIRA)" To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (YARN-6869) Resources.lessThan() et al should not use ResourceCalculator.compare() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:34:05 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100526#comment-16100526 ] Sunil G commented on YARN-6869: ------------------------------- Thanks [~templedf] While doing preemption, we ran into this issue. But I was thinking this api is needed a compare kind of method to get to know if there is any dominance or not for any resource type. Indeed it can have impact on these apis. If its a vanilla checks like lessThan, greaterThan etc, we can have api like absoluteLessThan, absoluteGreaterThan. And if dominance is mandatory to handle in these apis, we can leave these as it is. I am not having much of context regarding how important to see dominant check is needed for these api, so please feel free me to correct me. > Resources.lessThan() et al should not use ResourceCalculator.compare() > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-6869 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6869 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: resourcemanager > Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha4 > Reporter: Daniel Templeton > > If you look at what the callers of {{lessThan()}}, {{lessThanOrEqual()}}, {{greaterThan()}}, and {{greaterThanOrEqual()}} expect the calls to do, there's no reason why the comparison should be done in context of the total resources. Skipping the division and doing a direct comparison should improve performance. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org