Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63934200C5D for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 15:02:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 621D8160BA5; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 13:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A9EF4160B93 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 15:02:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 80145 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2017 13:02:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 80134 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2017 13:02:44 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 13:02:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7A17D1AA29C for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 13:02:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8_iGewv9JFXh for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 13:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id B642A5FDB4 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 13:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id F0296E0B21 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 13:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id ED5D12407D for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 13:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 13:02:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jason Lowe (JIRA)" To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (YARN-6443) Allow for Priority order relaxing in favor of improved node/rack locality MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 13:02:46 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15960755#comment-15960755 ] Jason Lowe commented on YARN-6443: ---------------------------------- Ah, so this apparently is describing a problem that only can occur if scheduler keys are being used? I'm not sure we need a flag here. Seems like we simply should not guarantee that allocations are returned within a priority group in the order they are requested -- they can be returned in any order. It certainly worked that way without scheduler keys. If you need ordering, that's what priorities are for. In that sense I see this not as an enhancement but rather a bugfix. Or am I misunderstanding the problem? > Allow for Priority order relaxing in favor of improved node/rack locality > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-6443 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6443 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: capacity scheduler, fairscheduler > Reporter: Arun Suresh > Assignee: Hitesh Sharma > > Currently the Schedulers examine an applications pending Requests in Priority order. This JIRA proposes to introduce a flag (either via the ApplicationMasterService::registerApplication() or via some Scheduler configuration) to favor an ordering that is baised to the node that is currently heartbeating by relaxing the priority constraint. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org