Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA4F200C4C for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:01:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 9C2E3160B92; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E1241160B76 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:01:45 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 82726 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2017 00:01:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 82709 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2017 00:01:44 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:01:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 671D4C0181 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:01:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.452 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.452 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AnkWoVyaqXQG for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id A758C5FE0B for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 114DBE00D5 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 49A45254DC for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:01:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:01:42 +0000 (UTC) From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (YARN-6302) Fail the node, if Linux Container Executor is not configured properly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:01:46 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15933820#comment-15933820 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on YARN-6302: -------------------------------------- Github user templedf commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/200#discussion_r107033241 --- Diff: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager/src/main/native/container-executor/impl/container-executor.h --- @@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ enum command { enum errorcodes { INVALID_ARGUMENT_NUMBER = 1, - INVALID_USER_NAME, //2 - INVALID_COMMAND_PROVIDED, //3 + //INVALID_USER_NAME 2 --- End diff -- This section of code makes me want to weep. > Fail the node, if Linux Container Executor is not configured properly > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-6302 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6302 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Miklos Szegedi > Assignee: Miklos Szegedi > Priority: Minor > > We have a cluster that has one node with misconfigured Linux Container Executor. Every time an AM or regular container is launched on the cluster, it will fail. The node will still have resources available, so it keeps failing apps until the administrator notices the issue and decommissions the node. AM Blacklisting only helps, if the application is already running. > As a possible improvement, when the LCE is used on the cluster and a NM gets certain errors back from the LCE, like error 24 configuration not found, we should not try to allocate anything on the node anymore or shut down the node entirely. That kind of problem normally does not fix itself and it means that nothing can really run on that node. > {code} > Application application_1488920587909_0010 failed 2 times due to AM Container for appattempt_1488920587909_0010_000002 exited with exitCode: -1000 > Failing this attempt.Diagnostics: Application application_1488920587909_0010 initialization failed (exitCode=24) with output: > For more detailed output, check the application tracking page: http://node-1.domain.com:8088/cluster/app/application_1488920587909_0010 Then click on links to logs of each attempt. > . Failing the application. > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org