Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22161200C3F for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:55:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 20AC3160B86; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 693F1160B74 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:55:48 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 17832 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2017 21:55:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 17821 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2017 21:55:46 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:55:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9D44E1AA2D7 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:55:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -98.549 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.549 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w2JBbiF0CfBq for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3ED5E5FCFA for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 02417E002B for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id ACE76254E7 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:55:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:55:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "Varun Saxena (JIRA)" To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-5269) Bubble exceptions and errors all the way up the calls, including to clients. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:55:49 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15937223#comment-15937223 ] Varun Saxena edited comment on YARN-5269 at 3/22/17 9:54 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------- We had actually discussed about TimelinePutResponse long before. I think where we thought TimelinePutResponse will be useful is that in HBaseTimelineWriterImpl#write we write entities one by one. And it maybe possible that a set of writes are successful and another set is not. But frankly writes are not persisted till flush is called, if buffer size is not exceeded. Should we attempt a flush for sync put even if an exception occurs on write. Can a flush succeed in such a scenario? cc [~vrushalic] was (Author: varun_saxena): We had actually discussed about TimelinePutResponse long before. I think where we though TimelinePutResponse will be useful is that in HBaseTimelineWriterImpl#write we write entities one by one. And it maybe possible that a set of writes are successful and another set is not. But frankly writes are not persisted till flush is called, if buffer size is not exceeded. Should we attempt a flush for sync put even if an exception occurs on write. Can a flush succeed in such a scenario? cc [~vrushalic] > Bubble exceptions and errors all the way up the calls, including to clients. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-5269 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5269 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: timelineserver > Affects Versions: YARN-2928 > Reporter: Joep Rottinghuis > Assignee: Haibo Chen > Labels: YARN-5355, yarn-5355-merge-blocker > > Currently we ignore (swallow) exception from the HBase side in many cases (reads and writes). > Also, on the client side, neither TimelineClient#putEntities (the v2 flavor) nor the #putEntitiesAsync method return any value. > For the second drop we may want to consider how we properly bubble up exceptions throughout the write and reader call paths and if we want to return a response in putEntities and some future kind of result for putEntitiesAsync. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org