hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Joep Rottinghuis (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-6357) Implement TimelineCollector#putEntitiesAsync
Date Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:52:41 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15929254#comment-15929254
] 

Joep Rottinghuis commented on YARN-6357:
----------------------------------------

bq. I can file a separate bug from this one dealing with exception handling to tackle the
sync vs async nature.
Sorry, copy paste from previous bug YARN-5269. This _is_ the separate jira.

[~varun_saxena] you were right in the previous call. I was thinking about the writer side
where flush works correctly, you were thinking one level up where flush wasn't appropriately
called.

> Implement TimelineCollector#putEntitiesAsync
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-6357
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6357
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: ATSv2, timelineserver
>    Affects Versions: YARN-2928
>            Reporter: Joep Rottinghuis
>            Assignee: Haibo Chen
>              Labels: yarn-5355-merge-blocker
>
> As discovered and discussed in YARN-5269 the TimelineCollector#putEntitiesAsync method
is currently not implemented and TimelineCollector#putEntities is asynchronous.
> TimelineV2ClientImpl#putEntities vs TimelineV2ClientImpl#putEntitiesAsync correctly call
TimelineEntityDispatcher#dispatchEntities(boolean sync,... with the correct argument. This
argument does seem to make it into the params, and on the server side TimelineCollectorWebService#putEntities
correctly pulls the async parameter from the rest call. See line 156:
> {code}
>     boolean isAsync = async != null && async.trim().equalsIgnoreCase("true");
> {code}
> However, this is where the problem starts. It simply calls TimelineCollector#putEntities
and ignores the value of isAsync. It should instead have called TimelineCollector#putEntitiesAsync,
which is currently not implemented.
> putEntities should call putEntitiesAsync and then after that call writer.flush()
> The fact that we flush on close and we flush periodically should be more of a concern
of avoiding data loss; close in case sync is never called and the periodic flush to guard
against having data from slow writers get buffered for a long time and expose us to risk of
loss in case the collector crashes with data in its buffers. Size-based flush is a different
concern to avoid blowing up memory footprint.
> The spooling behavior is also somewhat separate.
> We have two separate methods on our API putEntities and putEntitiesAsync and they should
have different behavior beyond waiting for the request to be sent.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org


Mime
View raw message