hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Haibo Chen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-5169) most YARN events have timestamp of -1
Date Wed, 08 Mar 2017 18:27:38 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901717#comment-15901717
] 

Haibo Chen commented on YARN-5169:
----------------------------------

[~sjlee0] [~gtCarrera9], IIUC from the above discussion, RM is already using System.currentTimeMillis()
to generate ATS event timestamps, that means we are not worried about its performance overhead?
If so, I think we should probably be consistent at least for events like container localization
that we persist in ATS v2. Otherwise, YARN_NM_CONTAINER_LOCALIZATION_STARTED event will just
show a timestamp of -1, which I don't think is of much value to users. Thoughts?

> most YARN events have timestamp of -1
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-5169
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5169
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: yarn
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.2
>            Reporter: Sangjin Lee
>
> Most of the YARN events (subclasses of {{AbstractEvent}}) have timestamp of -1. {{AbstractEvent}}
have two constructors, one that initializes the timestamp to -1 and the other to the caller-provided
value. But most events use the former (thus timestamp of -1).
> Some of the more common events, including {{ApplicationEvent}}, {{ContainerEvent}}, {{JobEvent}},
etc. do not set the timestamp.
> The rationale for this behavior seems to be mentioned in {{AbstractEvent}}:
> {code}
>   // use this if you DON'T care about the timestamp
>   public AbstractEvent(TYPE type) {
>     this.type = type;
>     // We're not generating a real timestamp here.  It's too expensive.
>     timestamp = -1L;
>   }
> {code}
> This absence of the timestamp isn't really visible in many cases and therefore may have
gone unnoticed, but the timeline service exposes this problem very visibly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org


Mime
View raw message