Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4754200C47 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:27:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id C334C160B62; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 23:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A981160B72 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:27:47 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 98285 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2017 23:27:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98274 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2017 23:27:47 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 23:27:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 907EAC193A for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 23:27:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.199 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xC63P_x_42pw for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 23:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 82B655F30F for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 23:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6FD0EE043B for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 23:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2961A24125 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 23:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 23:27:44 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daniel Templeton (JIRA)" To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (YARN-6210) FS: Node reservations can interfere with preemption MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 23:27:48 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15879463#comment-15879463 ] Daniel Templeton commented on YARN-6210: ---------------------------------------- You're gonna love me for this one... We now have: {code} if (!starved) { lastTimeAtFairShare = now; } if (!starved || now - lastTimeAtFairShare < fsQueue.getFairSharePreemptionTimeout()) { fairshareStarvation = Resources.none(); } {code} What about: {code} if (!starved || now - lastTimeAtFairShare < fsQueue.getFairSharePreemptionTimeout()) { if (!starved) { lastTimeAtFairShare = now; } fairshareStarvation = Resources.none(); } {code} ? > FS: Node reservations can interfere with preemption > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-6210 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6210 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fairscheduler > Affects Versions: 2.9.0 > Reporter: Karthik Kambatla > Assignee: Karthik Kambatla > Attachments: YARN-6210.1.patch, YARN-6210.2.patch, YARN-6210.3.patch, YARN-6210.4.patch > > > Today, on a saturated cluster, apps with pending demand reserve nodes. A new app might not be able to preempt resources because these nodes are already reserved. This can be reproduced by the example in YARN-6151. > Since node reservations are to prevent starvation of apps requesting large containers, triggering these reservations only on starved applications would avoid this situation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org