hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel Templeton (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-6050) AMs can't be scheduled on racks or nodes
Date Wed, 04 Jan 2017 21:56:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15799469#comment-15799469
] 

Daniel Templeton commented on YARN-6050:
----------------------------------------

I don't love that we're only taking the node label expression and capacity from the first
resource request.  Sounds like a recipe for confusion if the user doesn't make all the requests
the same.  Can we enforce that the requests all agree with each other?  Or maybe provide a
utility to create a family of consistent requests?  We should at least document that the requests
must all agree or that we ignore all but the first one.

> AMs can't be scheduled on racks or nodes
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-6050
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-6050
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.9.0, 3.0.0-alpha2
>            Reporter: Robert Kanter
>            Assignee: Robert Kanter
>         Attachments: YARN-6050.001.patch, YARN-6050.002.patch
>
>
> Yarn itself supports rack/node aware scheduling for AMs; however, there currently are
two problems:
> # To specify hard or soft rack/node requests, you have to specify more than one {{ResourceRequest}}.
 For example, if you want to schedule an AM only on "rackA", you have to create two {{ResourceRequest}},
like this:
> {code}
> ResourceRequest.newInstance(PRIORITY, ANY, CAPABILITY, NUM_CONTAINERS, false);
> ResourceRequest.newInstance(PRIORITY, "rackA", CAPABILITY, NUM_CONTAINERS, true);
> {code}
> The problem is that the Yarn API doesn't actually allow you to specify more than one
{{ResourceRequest}} in the {{ApplicationSubmissionContext}}.  The current behavior is to either
build one from {{getResource}} or directly from {{getAMContainerResourceRequest}}, depending
on if {{getAMContainerResourceRequest}} is null or not.  We'll need to add a third method,
say {{getAMContainerResourceRequests}}, which takes a list of {{ResourceRequest}} so that
clients can specify the multiple resource requests.
> # There are some places where things are hardcoded to overwrite what the client specifies.
 These are pretty straightforward to fix.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org


Mime
View raw message