Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F1B200BBB for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:25:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 067E0160AE1; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D182160AFD for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:25:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 6722 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2016 19:24:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6619 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2016 19:24:59 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:24:59 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75522C1F5A for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:24:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sunil G (JIRA)" To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:25:01 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15609409#comment-15609409 ] Sunil G commented on YARN-2009: ------------------------------- I understand the reason for this issue. Queue's free resource were not considered in the algorithm while calculating idealAssigned. So current code will work in cases where queue is full or overflowed. If queue is under-utilized, we may do over preemption. I ll share a patch short while. > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Sunil G > Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch, YARN-2009.0003.patch, YARN-2009.0004.patch, YARN-2009.0005.patch, YARN-2009.0006.patch, YARN-2009.0007.patch, YARN-2009.0008.patch, YARN-2009.0009.patch, YARN-2009.0010.patch, YARN-2009.0011.patch, YARN-2009.0012.patch, YARN-2009.0013.patch, YARN-2009.0014.patch, YARN-2009.0015.patch > > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org