Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423B2200B99 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 06:59:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 40D33160AC9; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 04:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 85670160AC5 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 06:59:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 7445 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2016 04:59:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 7426 invoked by uid 99); 21 Sep 2016 04:59:20 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 04:59:20 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88EA42C2A61 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 04:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 04:59:20 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jian He (JIRA)" To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-5609) Expose upgrade and restart API in ContainerManagementProtocol MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 04:59:22 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15508741#comment-15508741 ] Jian He edited comment on YARN-5609 at 9/21/16 4:58 AM: -------------------------------------------------------- bq. I had intentionally kept it that way (my thinking was that the Tracker will then verify that the resources.. directories etc. are still good) Yep, I also had that in mind for rollback. And I think it is indeed needed for rollback, because the old resource may have a chance to get purged... But for restart, as the same resources are re-used, we don't need to re-check. So, I guess we need to retain the behavior for rollback ? was (Author: jianhe): bq. I had intentionally kept it that way (my thinking was that the Tracker will then verify that the resources.. directories etc. are still good) Yep, I also had that in mind for rollback. And I think it is indeed needed for rollback, because the old resource may have a change to get purged... But for restart, as the same resources are re-used, we don't need to re-check. So, I guess we need to retain the behavior for rollback ? > Expose upgrade and restart API in ContainerManagementProtocol > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-5609 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-5609 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Arun Suresh > Assignee: Arun Suresh > Attachments: YARN-5609.001.patch, YARN-5609.002.patch, YARN-5609.003.patch, YARN-5609.004.patch, YARN-5609.005.patch, YARN-5609.006.patch > > > YARN-5620 and YARN-5637 allows an AM to explicitly *upgrade* a container with a new launch context and subsequently *rollback* / *commit* the change on the Container. This can also be used to simply *restart* the Container as well. > This JIRA proposes to extend the ContainerManagementProtocol with the following API: > * *reInitializeContainer* > * *rollbackLastUpgrade* > * *commitLastUpgrade* > * *restartContainer* -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org