hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sunil G (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
Date Tue, 27 Sep 2016 18:03:20 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Sunil G updated YARN-2009:
    Attachment: YARN-2009.0004.patch

Thank [~leftnoteasy] for the comments. Updating new patch addressing the comments.

bq.f. orderedApps is invented to avoid sorting, correct? If you need to sort it again, we
don't need it.
orderedApps is a list of TempAppPerPartition and comparator is designed based on FiFo. So
initial list is created from the PriorityQueue, and we removed each entry from top to get
the high priority app. {{orderedApps}} has just collected those apps in order, and then later
re-sorted to get apps in reverse order. {{tq.getApps}} return FiCaSchedulerApp, but we need
TempAppPerPartition. So i think {{orderedApps}} is needed for the logic. Did i miss something?

> Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: YARN-2009
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: capacityscheduler
>            Reporter: Devaraj K
>            Assignee: Sunil G
>         Attachments: YARN-2009.0001.patch, YARN-2009.0002.patch, YARN-2009.0003.patch,
> While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need to consider
preempting the low priority application containers first.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org

View raw message