Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB552009E8 for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 23:16:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id CB765160A19; Mon, 30 May 2016 21:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 210F1160969 for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 23:16:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 76305 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2016 21:16:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 76292 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2016 21:16:13 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 May 2016 21:16:13 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDBD2C1F6E for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 21:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 21:16:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Karthik Kambatla (JIRA)" To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (YARN-4837) User facing aspects of 'AM blacklisting' feature need fixing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Mon, 30 May 2016 21:16:15 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15306956#comment-15306956 ] Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-4837: ---------------------------------------- Thanks for working on this, Vinod. Quickly skimmed through the patch. It is definitely more maintainable, thanks again for the cleanup. Just one nit: RMAppAttemptImpl#shouldCountTowardsNodeBlacklisting: For ContainerExitStatus.DISKS_FAILED, doesn't that mean at least one disk failed? And, the NM can continue running with remaining disks right? Is the idea that even if we schedule it to the same node, the NM wouldn't give the same local directory? If yes, should we clarify the comment accordingly? > User facing aspects of 'AM blacklisting' feature need fixing > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: YARN-4837 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4837 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > Assignee: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > Priority: Critical > Attachments: YARN-4837-20160515.txt, YARN-4837-20160520.1.txt, YARN-4837-20160520.txt, YARN-4837-20160527.txt > > > Was reviewing the user-facing aspects that we are releasing as part of 2.8.0. > Looking at the 'AM blacklisting feature', I see several things to be fixed before we release it in 2.8.0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org