hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Wangda Tan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (YARN-4390) Do surgical preemption based on reserved container in CapacityScheduler
Date Thu, 28 Apr 2016 20:53:13 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Wangda Tan updated YARN-4390:
-----------------------------
    Attachment: YARN-4390.8.patch

Attached ver.8 patch fixed UT failure.

> Do surgical preemption based on reserved container in CapacityScheduler
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4390
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4390
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: capacity scheduler
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.8.0, 2.7.3
>            Reporter: Eric Payne
>            Assignee: Wangda Tan
>         Attachments: QueueNotHittingMax.jpg, YARN-4390-design.1.pdf, YARN-4390-test-results.pdf,
YARN-4390.1.patch, YARN-4390.2.patch, YARN-4390.3.branch-2.patch, YARN-4390.3.patch, YARN-4390.4.patch,
YARN-4390.5.patch, YARN-4390.6.patch, YARN-4390.7.patch, YARN-4390.8.patch
>
>
> There are multiple reasons why preemption could unnecessarily preempt containers. One
is that an app could be requesting a large container (say 8-GB), and the preemption monitor
could conceivably preempt multiple containers (say 8, 1-GB containers) in order to fill the
large container request. These smaller containers would then be rejected by the requesting
AM and potentially given right back to the preempted app.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message