hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-4759) Revisit signalContainer() for docker containers
Date Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:29:25 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15218532#comment-15218532
] 

Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on YARN-4759:
-----------------------------------------------

bq. To complicate matters, the docker client sends signals PID 1 in the container, so depending
on if exec form is used for CMD in the Dockerfile, the process we want to send the signal
to may be a subprocess of the shell running as PID 1.
[~shanekumpf@gmail.com], irrespective of where the signal is delivered, all the processes
and process-trees inside the container will get cleaned up, right? For e.g, if I create a
new session *inside* the container using setsid, that will get cleaned up too?

> Revisit signalContainer() for docker containers
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4759
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4759
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: yarn
>            Reporter: Sidharta Seethana
>            Assignee: Shane Kumpf
>
> The current signal handling (in the DockerContainerRuntime) needs to be revisited for
docker containers. For example, container reacquisition on NM restart might not work, depending
on which user the process in the container runs as. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message