Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E264219FE7 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25192 invoked by uid 500); 29 Feb 2016 18:07:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25143 invoked by uid 500); 29 Feb 2016 18:07:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 25130 invoked by uid 99); 29 Feb 2016 18:07:18 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:07:18 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A972C1F6A for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:07:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "Arun Suresh (JIRA)" To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (YARN-2883) Queuing of container requests in the NM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15172264#comment-15172264 ] Arun Suresh commented on YARN-2883: ----------------------------------- On going thru the patch again, I feel a better (and safer) way to introduce the changes is * to extend both the {{ContainerManagerImpl}} and the {{ContainersMonitorImpl}} classes into two new subclasses {{QueuedContainerManager}} and {{QueuedContainersManager}} * Then we can move all the required data structures (all the new collections) as well as the Event Handlers into the new classes. * We can also get rid of all the {{if context.isDistributedSchedulingEnabled()}} checks. Since we would need to do it only once in the {{NodeManager}} when we create the instance of the {{ContainerManager}} * We can also reason about the code flow better since we the changes would be isolated to the new classes. > Queuing of container requests in the NM > --------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-2883 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2883 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager > Reporter: Konstantinos Karanasos > Assignee: Konstantinos Karanasos > Attachments: YARN-2883-yarn-2877.001.patch > > > We propose to add a queue in each NM, where queueable container requests can be held. > Based on the available resources in the node and the containers in the queue, the NM will decide when to allow the execution of a queued container. > In order to ensure the instantaneous start of a guaranteed-start container, the NM may decide to pre-empt/kill running queueable containers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)