hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "jay vyas (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-4705) ATS 1.5 parse pipeline to consider handling open() events recoverably
Date Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:50:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15163222#comment-15163222
] 

jay vyas commented on YARN-4705:
--------------------------------

Ah the GlusterFS consistency model ? From my experience its not strongly consistent all the
time in all cases.  I'd cc [~chenh] and @childsb as well on this ... they are currently working
on these filesystems.

> ATS 1.5 parse pipeline to consider handling open() events recoverably
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4705
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4705
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: timelineserver
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>            Reporter: Steve Loughran
>            Priority: Minor
>
> During one of my own timeline test runs, I've been seeing a stack trace warning that
the CRC check failed in Filesystem.open() file; something the FS was ignoring.
> Even though its swallowed (and probably not the cause of my test failure), looking at
the code in {{LogInfo.parsePath()}} that it considers a failure to open a file as unrecoverable.

> on some filesystems, this may not be the case, i.e. if its open for writing it may not
be available for reading; checksums maybe a similar issue. 
> Perhaps a failure at open() should be viewed as recoverable while the app is still running?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message