Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 641FB18BB0 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:49:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19155 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2016 17:49:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19100 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2016 17:49:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19064 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2016 17:49:40 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:49:40 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA3C2C1F58 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:49:40 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sunil G (JIRA)" To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (YARN-2009) Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15096667#comment-15096667 ] Sunil G commented on YARN-2009: ------------------------------- Hi [~eepayne] Thank you. I guess its more for user fairness based preemption so that if some resource is grabbed by a user, its to be reclaimed back. Priority is another policy to add in inqueue preemption. I think these policies can be pluggable, and with same framework user can apply these triggers to achieve use cases. I think along with YARN-4108, inqueue preemption framework can be added first. And separate triggers (priority, user-limit) can be added as pluggable entities. thoughts? > Priority support for preemption in ProportionalCapacityPreemptionPolicy > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-2009 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2009 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler > Reporter: Devaraj K > Assignee: Sunil G > > While preempting containers based on the queue ideal assignment, we may need to consider preempting the low priority application containers first. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)