Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 477F6184BD for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 04:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86319 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2015 04:25:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86205 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2015 04:25:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 86187 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2015 04:25:05 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 04:25:05 +0000 Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 04:25:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Karthik Kambatla (JIRA)" To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (YARN-3176) In Fair Scheduler, child queue should inherit maxApp from its parent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14653038#comment-14653038 ] Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-3176: ---------------------------------------- The patch looks reasonable. I forget where exactly, but we do have code that figures out parent queue for a queue that does things similar to what the patch adds. Can we please check that and avoid duplication if possible. [~asuresh] - does the patch look reasonable to you? > In Fair Scheduler, child queue should inherit maxApp from its parent > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-3176 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3176 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Siqi Li > Assignee: Siqi Li > Attachments: YARN-3176.v1.patch, YARN-3176.v2.patch > > > if the child queue does not have a maxRunningApp limit, it will use the queueMaxAppsDefault. This behavior is not quite right, since queueMaxAppsDefault is normally a small number, whereas some parent queues do have maxRunningApp set to be more than the default -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)