hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sangjin Lee (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-3699) Decide if flow version should be part of row key or column
Date Mon, 01 Jun 2015 18:33:19 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14567744#comment-14567744
] 

Sangjin Lee commented on YARN-3699:
-----------------------------------

Thanks [~djp] for your comments!

Once everyone's comfortable with the decision of not making the flow version part of the row
key, then we could resolve this JIRA by recording that decision (+1 or -1). Then we could
open a separate JIRA for the phoenix writer to relocate the flow version (remove it from the
PK). But a bigger question there is, if we're going with the native HBase schema, what is
the status of the phoenix writer implementation?

For me, (if it wasn't obvious in previous comments), I'm +1 with the flow version *not* being
in the row key.

> Decide if  flow version should be part of row key or column
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3699
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3699
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Vrushali C
>
> Based on discussions in YARN-3411 with [~djp], filing jira for continuing discussion
on putting the flow version in rowkey or column. 
> Either phoenix/hbase approach will update the jira with the conclusions..



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message