Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 982E517A8F for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 20:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69410 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2015 20:30:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69366 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2015 20:30:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 69354 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2015 20:30:13 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 20:30:13 +0000 Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 20:30:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Wangda Tan (JIRA)" To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (YARN-3388) Allocation in LeafQueue could get stuck because DRF calculator isn't well supported when computing user-limit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14485952#comment-14485952 ] Wangda Tan commented on YARN-3388: ---------------------------------- [~nroberts], Thanks for updating, I took a look at your patch, approach LGTM, but I think node label should be considered in the same JIRA, when doing allocation under a labeled node, user-limit checking in the patch is incorrect. Actually user-limit for exclusive node label is already supported in latest trunk, and user-limit for non-exclusive node label is contains in YARN-3361, I think after YARN-3361, user-limit for node label will be in a good shape. Would you mind to take a look at computeUserLimit method of the patch attached in YARN-3361? To support computing consumed-per-partition, User.updateUsageRatio need receive partition as parameter. Some other comments: - consumedRatio -> totalDominateConsumed or some other name, it's better to make sum of "dominate" consumed in the name - consumed -> totalDominatedConsumedByPartition. - It's better to add a test case to make sure allocation locked descripted in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3388?focusedCommentId=14376060&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14376060 will not happened. > Allocation in LeafQueue could get stuck because DRF calculator isn't well supported when computing user-limit > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-3388 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3388 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Bug > Components: capacityscheduler > Affects Versions: 2.6.0 > Reporter: Nathan Roberts > Assignee: Nathan Roberts > Attachments: YARN-3388-v0.patch, YARN-3388-v1.patch > > > When there are multiple active users in a queue, it should be possible for those users to make use of capacity up-to max_capacity (or close). The resources should be fairly distributed among the active users in the queue. This works pretty well when there is a single resource being scheduled. However, when there are multiple resources the situation gets more complex and the current algorithm tends to get stuck at Capacity. > Example illustrated in subsequent comment. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)