hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jian He (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-3021) YARN's delegation-token handling disallows certain trust setups to operate properly over DistCp
Date Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:32:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14498674#comment-14498674
] 

Jian He commented on YARN-3021:
-------------------------------

[~yzhangal], I think the failure is not related. 
Patch looks good ,  +1. 
I'll commit this today if no comments from others.

> YARN's delegation-token handling disallows certain trust setups to operate properly over
DistCp
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-3021
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3021
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: security
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.0
>            Reporter: Harsh J
>            Assignee: Yongjun Zhang
>         Attachments: YARN-3021.001.patch, YARN-3021.002.patch, YARN-3021.003.patch, YARN-3021.004.patch,
YARN-3021.005.patch, YARN-3021.006.patch, YARN-3021.007.patch, YARN-3021.007.patch, YARN-3021.007.patch,
YARN-3021.patch
>
>
> Consider this scenario of 3 realms: A, B and COMMON, where A trusts COMMON, and B trusts
COMMON (one way trusts both), and both A and B run HDFS + YARN clusters.
> Now if one logs in with a COMMON credential, and runs a job on A's YARN that needs to
access B's HDFS (such as a DistCp), the operation fails in the RM, as it attempts a renewDelegationToken(…)
synchronously during application submission (to validate the managed token before it adds
it to a scheduler for automatic renewal). The call obviously fails cause B realm will not
trust A's credentials (here, the RM's principal is the renewer).
> In the 1.x JobTracker the same call is present, but it is done asynchronously and once
the renewal attempt failed we simply ceased to schedule any further attempts of renewals,
rather than fail the job immediately.
> We should change the logic such that we attempt the renewal but go easy on the failure
and skip the scheduling alone, rather than bubble back an error to the client, failing the
app submission. This way the old behaviour is retained.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message