hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vrushali C (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-3044) [Event producers] Implement RM writing app lifecycle events to ATS
Date Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:18:53 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14380675#comment-14380675

Vrushali C commented on YARN-3044:

bq. Well i too had the same doubt whether we need to capture very minute part of the life
cycle events as present in the RMAppState(/YarnApplicationState) and RMAppAttemptState. That
is the reason i had posted earlier but Sangjin Lee had opined to start of with the basic ones
hence provided this patch. Based on the input from all will add other required states

What is the reasoning behind capturing some but not all application lifecycle state changes?
I believe we should not be selectively filtering out capturing of application lifecycle state
changes in the next gen timeline service. 

> [Event producers] Implement RM writing app lifecycle events to ATS
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: YARN-3044
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3044
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: timelineserver
>            Reporter: Sangjin Lee
>            Assignee: Naganarasimha G R
>         Attachments: YARN-3044.20150325-1.patch
> Per design in YARN-2928, implement RM writing app lifecycle events to ATS.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message