hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jian He (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-2637) maximum-am-resource-percent could be respected for both LeafQueue/User when trying to activate applications.
Date Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:46:35 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14276287#comment-14276287
] 

Jian He commented on YARN-2637:
-------------------------------

lgtm too ,  thanks  [~cwelch] and [~leftnoteasy] !

> maximum-am-resource-percent could be respected for both LeafQueue/User when trying to
activate applications.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2637
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2637
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: resourcemanager
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>            Reporter: Wangda Tan
>            Assignee: Craig Welch
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: YARN-2637.0.patch, YARN-2637.1.patch, YARN-2637.12.patch, YARN-2637.13.patch,
YARN-2637.15.patch, YARN-2637.16.patch, YARN-2637.17.patch, YARN-2637.18.patch, YARN-2637.19.patch,
YARN-2637.2.patch, YARN-2637.20.patch, YARN-2637.21.patch, YARN-2637.22.patch, YARN-2637.23.patch,
YARN-2637.25.patch, YARN-2637.26.patch, YARN-2637.27.patch, YARN-2637.28.patch, YARN-2637.29.patch,
YARN-2637.30.patch, YARN-2637.31.patch, YARN-2637.32.patch, YARN-2637.36.patch, YARN-2637.38.patch,
YARN-2637.39.patch, YARN-2637.40.patch, YARN-2637.6.patch, YARN-2637.7.patch, YARN-2637.9.patch
>
>
> Currently, number of AM in leaf queue will be calculated in following way:
> {code}
> max_am_resource = queue_max_capacity * maximum_am_resource_percent
> #max_am_number = max_am_resource / minimum_allocation
> #max_am_number_for_each_user = #max_am_number * userlimit * userlimit_factor
> {code}
> And when submit new application to RM, it will check if an app can be activated in following
way:
> {code}
>     for (Iterator<FiCaSchedulerApp> i=pendingApplications.iterator(); 
>          i.hasNext(); ) {
>       FiCaSchedulerApp application = i.next();
>       
>       // Check queue limit
>       if (getNumActiveApplications() >= getMaximumActiveApplications()) {
>         break;
>       }
>       
>       // Check user limit
>       User user = getUser(application.getUser());
>       if (user.getActiveApplications() < getMaximumActiveApplicationsPerUser()) {
>         user.activateApplication();
>         activeApplications.add(application);
>         i.remove();
>         LOG.info("Application " + application.getApplicationId() +
>             " from user: " + application.getUser() + 
>             " activated in queue: " + getQueueName());
>       }
>     }
> {code}
> An example is,
> If a queue has capacity = 1G, max_am_resource_percent  = 0.2, the maximum resource that
AM can use is 200M, assuming minimum_allocation=1M, #am can be launched is 200, and if user
uses 5M for each AM (> minimum_allocation). All apps can still be activated, and it will
occupy all resource of a queue instead of only a max_am_resource_percent of a queue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message