hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Zhijie Shen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-2390) Investigating whehther generic history service needs to support queue-acls
Date Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:20:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14100880#comment-14100880
] 

Zhijie Shen commented on YARN-2390:
-----------------------------------

[~sunilg], please feel free to assign the ticket to youself.

bq. If the rmApp state is not FinalApplicationStatus.UNDEFINED,

Is this check necessary? The application can do unregistration without specifying FinalApplicationStatus.
I'm not sure whether RM will conclude a FinalApplicationStatus on behalf of the app.

> Investigating whehther generic history service needs to support queue-acls
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-2390
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2390
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Zhijie Shen
>
> According YARN-1250,  it's arguable whether queue-acls should be applied to the generic
history service as well, because the queue admin may not need the access to the completed
application that is removed from the queue. Create this ticket to tackle the discussion around.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message