hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Varun Saxena (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-2136) RMStateStore can explicitly handle store/update events when fenced
Date Wed, 13 Aug 2014 21:32:13 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14096160#comment-14096160

Varun Saxena commented on YARN-2136:

[~sunilg], on closer look at the code, when we close the RMStateStore, we close the ZKClients
as well. Hence dispatcher queue draining shouldn't matter as ZKClient is already closed. 
Ofcourse as more than one thread is involved, AsyncDispatcher's event handling thread may
pick up an event and process it(store/update operation) before RM can close RMStateStore(while
switching to standby). 

But in my view, this shouldn't be too big an impact I think to warrant adding a FENCED state.

> RMStateStore can explicitly handle store/update events when fenced
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: YARN-2136
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2136
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Jian He
> RMStateStore can choose to handle/ignore store/update events upfront instead of invoking
more ZK operations if state store is at fenced state. 

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message