Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AC2C118DA for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55095 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2014 20:14:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55041 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2014 20:14:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 55025 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2014 20:14:06 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:14:06 +0000 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:14:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (YARN-2069) CS queue level preemption should respect user-limits MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14062578#comment-14062578 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-2069: --------------------------------- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12654821/YARN-2069-trunk-5.patch against trunk revision . {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files. {color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages. {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with eclipse:eclipse. {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings. {color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. {color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager: org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.webapp.TestRMWebServices org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.webapp.TestRMWebServicesCapacitySched org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.webapp.TestRMWebServicesAppsModification org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.webapp.TestRMWebServicesNodes org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.webapp.TestRMWebServicesApps org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.webapp.TestRMWebServicesFairScheduler {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/4311//testReport/ Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/4311//console This message is automatically generated. > CS queue level preemption should respect user-limits > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-2069 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2069 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: capacityscheduler > Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > Assignee: Mayank Bansal > Attachments: YARN-2069-trunk-1.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-2.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-3.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-4.patch, YARN-2069-trunk-5.patch > > > This is different from (even if related to, and likely share code with) YARN-2113. > YARN-2113 focuses on making sure that even if queue has its guaranteed capacity, it's individual users are treated in-line with their limits irrespective of when they join in. > This JIRA is about respecting user-limits while preempting containers to balance queue capacities. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)