Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB92810492 for ; Sat, 3 May 2014 23:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13478 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2014 23:28:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13402 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2014 23:28:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 13393 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2014 23:28:17 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 May 2014 23:28:17 +0000 Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 23:28:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Abin Shahab (JIRA)" To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (YARN-1983) Support heterogeneous container types at runtime on YARN MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13988840#comment-13988840 ] Abin Shahab commented on YARN-1983: ----------------------------------- I'm assuming we'll still be using a generic container executor for this(among other things). Shall we refer to this executor as GenericContainerExecutor? > Support heterogeneous container types at runtime on YARN > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-1983 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1983 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Junping Du > > Different container types (default, LXC, docker, VM box, etc.) have different semantics on isolation of security, namespace/env, performance, etc. > Per discussions in YARN-1964, we have some good thoughts on supporting different types of containers running on YARN and specified by application at runtime which largely enhance YARN's flexibility to meet heterogenous app's requirement on isolation at runtime. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)