hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ming Ma (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (YARN-2082) Support for alternative log aggregation mechanism
Date Wed, 21 May 2014 06:35:38 GMT
Ming Ma created YARN-2082:
-----------------------------

             Summary: Support for alternative log aggregation mechanism
                 Key: YARN-2082
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2082
             Project: Hadoop YARN
          Issue Type: New Feature
            Reporter: Ming Ma


I will post a more detailed design later. Here is the brief summary and would like to get
early feedback.

Problem Statement:

Current implementation of log aggregation create one HDFS file for each {application, nodemanager
}. These files are relative small, in the range of 1-2 MB. In a large cluster with lots of
application and many nodemanagers, it ends up creating lots of small files in HDFS. This creates
pressure on HDFS NN on the following ways.

1. It increases NN Memory size. It is mitigated by having history server deletes old log files
in HDFS.
2. Runtime RPC hit on HDFS. Each log aggregation file introduced several NN RPCs such as create,
getAdditionalBlock, complete, rename. When the cluster is busy, such RPC hit has impact on
NN performance.

In addition, to support non-MR applications on YARN, we might need to support aggregation
for long running applications.


Design choices:

1. Don't aggregate all the logs, as in YARN-221.
2. Create a dedicated HDFS namespace used only for log aggregation.
3. Write logs to some key-value store like HBase. HBase's RPC hit on NN will be much less.
4. Decentralize the application level log aggregation to NMs. All logs for a given application
are aggregated first by a dedicated NM before it is pushed to HDFS.
5. Have NM aggregate logs on a regular basis; each of these log files will have data from
different applications and there needs to be some index for quick lookup.


Proposal:

1. Make yarn log aggregation pluggable for both read and write path. Note that Hadoop FileSystem
provides an abstraction and we could ask alternative log aggregator implement compatable FileSystem,
but that seems to an overkill.

2. Provide a log aggregation plugin that write to HBase. The scheme design needs to support
efficient read on a per application as well as per application+container basis; in addition,
it shouldn't create hotspot in a cluster where certain users might create more jobs than others.
For example, we can use hash($user+$applicationId} + containerid as the row key.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message