hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ming Ma (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-445) Ability to signal containers
Date Wed, 05 Mar 2014 05:09:55 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13920507#comment-13920507
] 

Ming Ma commented on YARN-445:
------------------------------

Any comments on the proposal to do signaling via client -> RM -> NM? If there is no
objection, I can start to create subtasks for changes necessary in yarn, MR, webUI, etc.

> Ability to signal containers
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-445
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-445
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: nodemanager
>            Reporter: Jason Lowe
>            Assignee: Andrey Klochkov
>         Attachments: YARN-445--n2.patch, YARN-445--n3.patch, YARN-445--n4.patch, YARN-445.patch
>
>
> It would be nice if an ApplicationMaster could send signals to contaniers such as SIGQUIT,
SIGUSR1, etc.
> For example, in order to replicate the jstack-on-task-timeout feature implemented by
MAPREDUCE-1119 in Hadoop 0.21 the NodeManager needs an interface for sending SIGQUIT to a
container.  For that specific feature we could implement it as an additional field in the
StopContainerRequest.  However that would not address other potential features like the ability
for an AM to trigger jstacks on arbitrary tasks *without* killing them.  The latter feature
would be a very useful debugging tool for users who do not have shell access to the nodes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message