hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Karthik Kambatla (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-1461) RM API and RM changes to handle tags for running jobs
Date Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:50:10 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13887322#comment-13887322

Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-1461:

bq. Usually, what we do is to define a Java enum, use it in API records, and map it to the
corresponding proto class. The mapping is invoked in PBImpl of the API records. Please take
a look at YarnApplicationState and YarnApplicationStateProto.

I see. Just looked at YarnApplicationState and YarnApplicationStateProto. We could do something
similar for this too. However, I am curious why having two different enums, one in Java and
one in proto, and a converter between the two is preferable to just having one enum and no
converter? Particularly, in this case, it is always going to be a 1:1 mapping between the

> RM API and RM changes to handle tags for running jobs
> -----------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: YARN-1461
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-1461
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: resourcemanager
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Karthik Kambatla
>            Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
>         Attachments: yarn-1461-1.patch, yarn-1461-2.patch, yarn-1461-3.patch, yarn-1461-4.patch,
yarn-1461-5.patch, yarn-1461-6.patch, yarn-1461-6.patch, yarn-1461-7.patch, yarn-1461-8.patch,

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message