hadoop-yarn-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (YARN-659) RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId
Date Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:42:14 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13854837#comment-13854837
] 

Hadoop QA commented on YARN-659:
--------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12619966/YARN-659.1.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new or modified
test files.

    {color:red}-1 javac{color:red}.  The patch appears to cause the build to fail.

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/2710//console

This message is automatically generated.

> RMStateStore's removeApplication APIs should just take an applicationId
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-659
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-659
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: resourcemanager
>            Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>            Assignee: Tsuyoshi OZAWA
>         Attachments: YARN-659.1.patch
>
>
> There is no need to give in the whole state for removal - just an ID should be enough
when an app finishes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)

Mime
View raw message