Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 22:33:52 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Andrey Klochkov (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12633650.1361552234337.165071.1379630032675@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12633650.1361552234337@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12633650.1361552234337@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Updated] (YARN-415) Capture memory utilization at the
 app-level for chargeback
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andrey Klochkov updated YARN-415:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: YARN-415--n3.patch

Updating the patch with fixes in tests.
                
> Capture memory utilization at the app-level for chargeback
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-415
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-415
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: resourcemanager
>    Affects Versions: 0.23.6
>            Reporter: Kendall Thrapp
>            Assignee: Andrey Klochkov
>         Attachments: YARN-415--n2.patch, YARN-415--n3.patch, YARN-415.patch
>
>
> For the purpose of chargeback, I'd like to be able to compute the cost of an
> application in terms of cluster resource usage.  To start out, I'd like to get the memory utilization of an application.  The unit should be MB-seconds or something similar and, from a chargeback perspective, the memory amount should be the memory reserved for the application, as even if the app didn't use all that memory, no one else was able to use it.
> (reserved ram for container 1 * lifetime of container 1) + (reserved ram for
> container 2 * lifetime of container 2) + ... + (reserved ram for container n * lifetime of container n)
> It'd be nice to have this at the app level instead of the job level because:
> 1. We'd still be able to get memory usage for jobs that crashed (and wouldn't appear on the job history server).
> 2. We'd be able to get memory usage for future non-MR jobs (e.g. Storm).
> This new metric should be available both through the RM UI and RM Web Services REST API.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira