Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 282179B62 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 10:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9808 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2013 10:47:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-yarn-issues-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9689 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2013 10:47:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9301 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2013 10:47:19 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:47:19 +0000 Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 10:47:19 +0000 (UTC) From: "Hudson (JIRA)" To: yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (YARN-443) allow OS scheduling priority of NM to be different than the containers it launches MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13597900#comment-13597900 ] Hudson commented on YARN-443: ----------------------------- Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk #150 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Yarn-trunk/150/]) YARN-443. allow OS scheduling priority of NM to be different than the containers it launches (tgraves) (Revision 1454411) Result = SUCCESS tgraves : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1454411 Files : * /hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-yarn-project/CHANGES.txt * /hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/conf/YarnConfiguration.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/nodemanager/ContainerExecutor.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/nodemanager/DefaultContainerExecutor.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/nodemanager/LinuxContainerExecutor.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/nodemanager/TestContainerExecutor.java * /hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/nodemanager/TestLinuxContainerExecutorWithMocks.java > allow OS scheduling priority of NM to be different than the containers it launches > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: YARN-443 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-443 > Project: Hadoop YARN > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: nodemanager > Affects Versions: 2.0.3-alpha, 0.23.6 > Reporter: Thomas Graves > Assignee: Thomas Graves > Fix For: 3.0.0, 0.23.7, 2.0.4-alpha > > Attachments: YARN-443-branch-0.23.patch, YARN-443-branch-0.23.patch, YARN-443-branch-0.23.patch, YARN-443-branch-0.23.patch, YARN-443-branch-2.patch, YARN-443-branch-2.patch, YARN-443-branch-2.patch, YARN-443.patch, YARN-443.patch, YARN-443.patch, YARN-443.patch, YARN-443.patch, YARN-443.patch, YARN-443.patch > > > It would be nice if we could have the nodemanager run at a different OS scheduling priority than the containers so that you can still communicate with the nodemanager if the containers out of control. > On linux we could launch the nodemanager at a higher priority, but then all the containers it launches would also be at that higher priority, so we need a way for the container executor to launch them at a lower priority. > I'm not sure how this applies to windows if at all. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira