Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DFC200BA7 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 01:09:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 17662160AED; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 23:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 331A2160ADB for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 01:09:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 2836 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2016 23:09:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 2792 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2016 23:09:03 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 23:09:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5205F1A5C98; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 23:09:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.23 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.23 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kUxvTjxfIK-4; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 23:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com (mail-oi0-f45.google.com [209.85.218.45]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8274B5F22E; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 23:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f45.google.com with SMTP id d132so39084626oib.2; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 16:09:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=7QNqoXV7VuCGcQaDr86I1pAUt4/Z9Xig2JjJ7P4nCpg=; b=RDhHkiSn6Jur9FPw/a190oaRC3bwOv6XfA183zeQ5KTLZpjMjL6EdUuRyD8bb9J+14 tSmn+9UD0igz12zFxX19CCIr0A8T50thuJgg1DzBxcNq9JbwFZ3hHQmzHWeyyPALpwXi 27bUQPy/XZAkgalH/2HDwcx7BRtWySl/rdxtVkZw+8+GKhwpd5PSG2C4ML8SWTTDg8dM B6WZzkb6ZvP4ZILsqgzgEUEQ9ppVfSxThF0Xwe9LnjCjdEJol8O1uHrbkNcEMFLs3pYJ cXFuPPvcFxP66Tliy9h3K0Br/5VAo+l8xJUfcxw/pkuSR1GTDnCkVaStBMmvHm9Sd6J2 3iuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7QNqoXV7VuCGcQaDr86I1pAUt4/Z9Xig2JjJ7P4nCpg=; b=GOasDfG1xJffZCgM4zaOXVRRlAvIPUqVOxbzRa1HqYOR146810+9ovkTRZ1DCJmBX9 1RF68lBSiLFhjK9YWpKZO1xxK3M0rl5xJhYj+e+2/9+c8RstIrhGe0THDGpPKVhO8l6h Knv5l4oVGzlPXDVJVuynJ4Dy8pKCw42UTD3v9ULnSuWpPhFdzW5boRzvAok0jnJ8WYj2 LaRZnazFjTOmCerEXBDGZfLz8K3Y/NFl7jq+wF/4QP+D3Lo9B+DldRluPdHrBXRRs8q5 5D3+quIu2fs1sdR9s1utg8KRfPqzNU8LphQkHWMre4aKLfm8t8So6EmAG1hbtLS4+EOO Eztw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlewCmCFvwCL2/80Z/jF/ftnHYsL+c233gDaAfomilRAfsyIQvJEOOQ8ylGdR4AJc3nri7295LvVJCOog== X-Received: by 10.202.245.144 with SMTP id t138mr13100162oih.162.1475795340992; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 16:09:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: sjlee0@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.104.103 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 16:08:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <771157C8-277D-4D8E-85A9-18BA72D8DAE4@effectivemachines.com> From: Sangjin Lee Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 16:08:40 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: g8dUMirf5q0mVq6lSb6xtpjdHns Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.5 (RC1) To: Andrew Wang Cc: Akira Ajisaka , Allen Wittenauer , "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113df16a0fad40053e3a61f1 archived-at: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 23:09:06 -0000 --001a113df16a0fad40053e3a61f1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I think it's a good idea. We can still have the underlying data (in *-version.properties) but we can consider removing the date and the build person from the web UI. I'll file a JIRA to consider the idea. I would greatly appreciate it if you folks can take a little time to take the RC1 for a spin and vote on it. Tomorrow will be the conclusion of the vote, and I haven't received many votes yet. Thanks! Sangjin On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Andrew Wang wrote: > I don't think it's a blocker, though I wonder what the point of that date > and attribution are on the WebUI. > > Maybe file a follow-on JIRA to remove it for the future? > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Sangjin Lee wrote: > > > I looked into building it on jenkins earlier, but it appears that this > > jenkins job is busted (at least for 2.6.x): > > https://builds.apache.org/job/HADOOP2_Release_Artifacts_Builder/ > > > > I don't have access to the job configuration, so I'm unable to fix it > atm. > > > > That said, I do think Allen has a point. It strikes me that the release > > manager building it under his/her own control shouldn't be a problem, if > > not better. Also, the how-to-release wiki currently seems to suggest > > building it locally is fine (http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease > ). > > > > IMO I don't think this is a blocker. Thoughts? > > > > Thanks, > > Sangjin > > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Akira Ajisaka < > ajisakaa@oss.nttdata.co.jp> > > wrote: > > > > > > It wasn't 'renamed' to jenkins, prior releases were actually built by > > > and on the Jenkins infrastructure. Which was a very very bad idea: > it's > > > insecure and pretty much against ASF policy. > > > > > > Sorry for the confusion. I should not have used the word 'rename'. > > > What I meant is that "would you change the name to 'jenkins' by using > the > > > Jenkins infra?" > > > > > > Regards, > > > Akira > > > > > > > > > On 10/7/16 03:04, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> On Oct 5, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Akira Ajisaka < > ajisakaa@oss.nttdata.co.jp> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> Can we rename it? > > >>> > > >>> AFAIK, hadoop releases were built by hortonmu in 2014 and was renamed > > to > > >>> jenkins. > > >>> > > >> > > >> That's not how that works. > > >> > > >> It's literally storing the id of the person who built the > > >> classes. It wasn't 'renamed' to jenkins, prior releases were actually > > >> built by and on the Jenkins infrastructure. Which was a very very bad > > >> idea: it's insecure and pretty much against ASF policy. > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org > > > > > > > > > --001a113df16a0fad40053e3a61f1--