Mailing-List: contact yarn-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMXuLLp7kRjEg7GeTGp3-ajujj0fYBYx8YxzczX=1DXX3BggaQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGB5D2ZpeD1PNJHoDGJBx0t-2QxFtFihTwVwgpaK6eRLMzR2gQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMXuLLp7kRjEg7GeTGp3-ajujj0fYBYx8YxzczX=1DXX3BggaQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Wang <andrew.wang@cloudera.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:57:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGB5D2a8_JOTiw6CKZaQtQvMkSZCJUwrxUovanKjguwgqcE6AA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0-alpha1 RC0
To: Zhe Zhang <zhz@apache.org>
Cc: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>,
	"hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org>,
	"mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org>,
	"yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140b0a43b1474053b4db870
archived-at: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:58:01 -0000

--001a1140b0a43b1474053b4db870
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I'll put my own +1 on it:

* Built from source
* Started pseudo cluster and ran Pi job successfully

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Zhe Zhang <zhz@apache.org> wrote:

>
> Thanks Andrew for the great work! It's really exciting to finally see a
> Hadoop 3 RC.
>
> I noticed CHANGES and RELEASENOTES markdown files which were not in
> previous RCs like 2.7.3. What are good tools to verify them? I tried
> reading them on IntelliJ but format looks odd.
>
> I'm still testing the RC:
> - Downloaded and verified checksum
> - Built from source
> - Will start small cluster and test simple programs, focusing on EC
> functionalities
>
> -- Zhe
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:51 AM Andrew Wang <andrew.wang@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thanks to the combined work of many, many contributors, here's an RC0 for
>> 3.0.0-alpha1:
>>
>> http://home.apache.org/~wang/3.0.0-alpha1-RC0/
>>
>> alpha1 is the first in a series of planned alpha releases leading up to
>> GA.
>> The objective is to get an artifact out to downstreams for testing and to
>> iterate quickly based on their feedback. So, please keep that in mind when
>> voting; hopefully most issues can be addressed by future alphas rather
>> than
>> future RCs.
>>
>> Sorry for getting this out on a Tuesday, but I'd still like this vote to
>> run the normal 5 days, thus ending Saturday (9/3) at 9AM PDT. I'll extend
>> if we lack the votes.
>>
>> Please try it out and let me know what you think.
>>
>> Best,
>> Andrew
>>
>

--001a1140b0a43b1474053b4db870--